Laserfiche WebLink
whatever the costs are above and beyond the $3250 per decibel per benefiting resident. This <br />option has much more uncertainty to the city than does the lump sum option. <br />Please be aware that the installation of approximately 2000 feet of the 3000 foot noise wall will <br />impact existing trees in the area. Some of these trees are mature Oak trees and other areas are <br />very dense clusters of trees. So, the impacts will be very large. <br />3 The City requests that MnDOT commit that fill generated on the project will first stay on the <br />project and be used for sound mitigation berming in all areas where noise walls are not proposed. <br />Additional fill material, if it exists, should be used for berming along both sides of I -694 west of the <br />project limits. <br />Mn /DOT response Mn /DOT has investigated potential berming areas on the project. In looking <br />at berming areas, it is necessary to look at areas that would allow berming within the existing R/W. <br />The only area where berming can be constructed within the existing R/VV is on the south side of 1- <br />694 west of old TH 10. Mn /DOT is able to berm in this location while avoiding the area needed for <br />ponding. The berm will be constructed meeting Mn /DOT design standards for clear zone setbacks, <br />drainage requirements and wetland impacts. There will be impacts to mature trees with this <br />berming. Mn /DOT will identify these impacts and requests that these impacts be discussed and <br />agreed to by Arden Hills. <br />4 The City requests that MnDOT prove that the traffic modeling for the I- 694/TH 51 improvement <br />considered the entire region and the effect the proposed grade separated intersection of TH 10 /CR <br />96 with the loss of some movements will have on the entire transportation system. Furthermore, <br />the City wants MnDOT modeling to document that the proposed improvement veil cause no harm <br />and actually provide benefit to the county and local road system beyond Hamline Avenue, County <br />Road F, Lexington Avenue, County Road E and Lexington Bridge over 1-694. <br />Mn /DOT response Mn /DOT can confirm that the traffic modeling for this project has considered <br />the entire region and the effect the proposed grade separated intersection of TH 10 /CR 96 has on <br />it. In addition, Mn /DOT will prepare an exhibit showing the 2010 traffic counts for the local roadway <br />system for both the no build and the build condition. This exhibit will show the local traffic <br />conditions resulting from both projects. <br />6 The City requests that MnDO T commit that there are no city costs associated with the <br />proposed improvements necessary on interstate, county or local system (including changes that <br />might be required on County Roads E, F, Hamline Avenue, Lexington Avenue or the junctions <br />An Equal Opportunity Employer <br />