My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2A, MnDot I694TH 51 Improvement Project Municipal Consent Discu
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
10-11-10- WS
>
2A, MnDot I694TH 51 Improvement Project Municipal Consent Discu
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2024 12:07:04 AM
Creation date
1/31/2011 10:48:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
10-11-10 City Council Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
........................... ............................ <br /> ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—March 10. 2008 13 <br /> Councilmember Grant stated that it is not clear in the document that the City was willing to <br /> sacrifice the width of mediums and shoulders in order to have a trail on both sides. He also <br /> stated that the design constraints needed to be prioritized. <br /> Mayor Harpstcad stated that he did not have enough information at this time to prioritize these <br /> constraints. <br /> Councilmember Holden stated that she would not want to prioritize at this time. <br /> Councilmember Grant stated that if he were to prioritize he would be willing to sacrifice width <br /> in the median and shoulder in order to have a trail on both sides. <br /> Councilmember Holden agreed with Councilmember Grant. She pointed out that a trail on the <br /> south side does make County Road 96 hug as far south as it can. - <br /> Mayor Harpstead stated that especially in the area where it approaches Round Lake Road they <br /> do not want it to be in alignment with the bridge but the City wants it as close to Round Lake as <br /> possible, which should be added to Design Constraint #3. <br /> It was the consensus of the Council that County Road 96 should be as close to Round Lake as <br /> possible rather than to the future alignment with the Highway 35W bridge expansion, and that <br /> this be added to Design Constraint#3. <br /> Councilmember Grant stated that Design Constraint 44 referred to a pedestrian crossing, either <br /> over or under, located east of North Heights Lutheran Church but it could also be taken to refer <br /> to an over or under, a grade separated intersection, at Highway I0 and County Road 96. <br /> Mayor Harpstead stated he would like to have the sentence under Design Constraint #4 to read_ <br /> Provide pedestrian crossing over or under County Road 96 to the east of the access at North <br /> Heights Lutheran Church. <br /> Councilmember Grant stated he would like to add that if there is a grade separated intersection, <br /> the bridges should allow for pedestrian traffic. <br /> Councilmember McClung clarified Councilmember Grant's comments stating that if a design <br /> comes back having County Road 96 going over Highway 10, there should be a pedestrian option <br /> as part of that. <br /> Mayor Harpstead restated that the sentence under Design Constraint 44 needs to capture the <br /> access to the east of North Heights Lutheran Church or to any bridges built to allow for <br /> pedestrian crossing. <br /> Councilmember Holden agreed with allowing for pedestrian crossing on any bridges that may <br /> be built_ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.