Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION-- SEPTEMBER 20, 2010 5 <br /> Councilmember Holden stated that Eureka recycles everything while other companies do not. <br /> She believed we should compare the level of service as well as cost. <br /> Mayor Harpstead agreed that the City receives a high level of service and that Eureka recycles <br /> more materials than other companies. He added that he would like to see them recycle plastic <br /> bags. <br /> Chris Goodwin, Eureka Recycling, explained that they can't take plastic bags at this time <br /> because once they're wet it takes a long time for them to dry and they can't be recycled while <br /> wet_ <br /> Mayor Harpstead asked about any composting plans for the future. <br /> Chris Goodwin explained that the PCA is looking for comments from cities regarding organic <br /> materials. Currently if a company wants to begin handling organic materials, they must go <br /> through the very extensive landfill approval process. There is only one organic processing center <br /> in the state at this time. <br /> Councilmember McClung stated he would be in favor of the 2 one year extensions or the <br /> contract amendment to extend the contract for three years but he would like to review cost <br /> comparisons. <br /> Chris Goodwin stated that Ramsey County has a source for cost comparisons for cities. <br /> Councilmember Holden suggested it would be helpful to educate residents about recycling and <br /> she suggested that Eureka add info on a regular basis to the City's newsletter. <br /> There was a unanimous Council consensus to direct staff to explore extending the contract with <br /> Eureka while providing cost comparisons and composting information. <br /> 2.D Mn/DOT 1-694 Improvement Project—follow up from public hearing <br /> Public Works Director Terry Maurer explained that the City has until October 25 to act on the <br /> matter of Municipal Consent. He further explained that the transportation committee can ignore <br /> a city's denial of municipal consent and move forward_ He suggested a better scenario would be <br /> for the city to deny the consent with conditions. He further explained that he and Civil Engineer <br /> Kris Giga had met with Mn/DOT and Shoreview. A letter from Mn/DOT was included in the <br /> Council packet. <br /> Mayor Harpstead asked if Shoreview has concerns about any of the proposed changes. <br /> Public Works Director Terry Maurer stated that Shoreview is relying on Ramsey County to <br /> make sure appropriate improvements are made by Mn/DOT so there is no adverse impact to <br /> Shoreview roadways. Be added that it is his impression that the County is OK with the current <br /> proposal. <br />