2A, MnDot I694TH 51 Improvement Project Municipal Consent Discu

Home Browse Search

Possible Conditions for a Municipal Consent Resolution for the I694/TH51 Project 1. The City understands MnDOT's policy regarding cost participation in the construction of noise walls. However, the City would like more information on _ the $3250 per decibel per benefiting property. How was this dollar amount determined? When was the last time the dollar amount was increased? How often is the $3250 rate reviewed? 2. The City would like MnDOT to provide documentation that the traffic modeling for the 1694/TH5I improvement considered the entire region and the effect the proposed grade separated intersection of TH10/CR96 with the loss of some movements will have on the entire transportation system 3. The City requests that MnDOT commit that there are no city costs associated with the proposed improvements necessary on interstate, county or local system to construct the I694/TH51 interchange shown on the approved layout with the exception of noise walls. 4. The City requests that MnDOT change the layout as necessary to provide the required spacing for a 10 foot wide bituminous trail on the west side of old Snelling Avenue/old TH 10 as it passes under 1694. 5. The City requests that MnDOT show on the approved layout a 6 foot wide concrete sidewalk on the west side of Hamline Avenue from Floral Drive to County Road F and on the south side of County Road F towards Lexington Avenue to the sidewalk to be built as part of the Arden Village Development 6. The City requests that the revise traffic data outlined in the MnDOT letter dated September 14. 2010 be added to the approved layout. 7. The City request that MnDOT clearly state that the proposed bridge structure will not preclude the attachment of a pedestrian facility at any time in the future. 8. The City requests the MnDOT clearly state that the existing area on Trunk Highway 51 available for pedestrian movements will not be lessened in the future with the proposed improvements.