My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6B, Public Hearing Proposed TIF District Resolution 2010-081, -082 & -083
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
12-13-10- R
>
6B, Public Hearing Proposed TIF District Resolution 2010-081, -082 & -083
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2024 10:26:14 AM
Creation date
2/2/2011 9:52:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
12-13-10 Regular City Counicl Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
159
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Suhsectian 2-25. Annual Disclosure Requir�ments <br />Pursuant to M. S„ Section 469.175, Subds. 5, 6, and 6b the City must undertake iinancial reporting far aIl ta�c <br />increment financing districts to the Office of the Sta�e Auditar, County Board and County Audi#ar on or <br />before August 1 of each year. M.S., Section 4b9.175, Subd. S also provides that an annual statement sha[1 be <br />published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City on ar before August 15. <br />If the City fails to maice a disclosure or submit a report containing the information required by M.S., �'ection <br />4b9.175 �ubd. 5 and Subd. G, the OSA will direct the County Auditor to withhold the distribution of ta� <br />increment from the District. <br />Subsection 2-26. Reasonable Expectations <br />As required by the TIF Act, in establishing the District, the detezmination has been rnade that the anticipated <br />de�elopmer�t would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the <br />reasonably fareseeable future and that the increased market value ofthe si#e that could reasonabIy be expected <br />to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less tk�an the inerease in the market �alue <br />estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax <br />increments for the m�imum duration of #he District permitted by the TIF Plan. In making said <br />determination, reliance has been placed upon written representations made by the de�eloper to such effects <br />and �pon Ci#y staff awareness of the feasibility of developing the project site(s) within the District. A <br />eamparative analysis of estimated �narket values both with and wiihout establishrnent of the District and the <br />use of tax increments has been performed as described above. Such analysis is included with the cashflow <br />in Appendix D, and indicates that the increase in estimated ma�rket �aIue af the proposed development (less <br />the indicated subtractions} exceeds the estimated market value of the site absent the establishment of the <br />District and the use of tax increments. <br />Subsection 2-27. Other Limitations on �he Use of Tax Encrement <br />General Limitations. All revenue derived from tax inerement shaIl be used in accordance with the TIF <br />Plan. The revenues shall be used io finance, or otherwise pay the capital and administration costs of <br />De�elopment District No. 1 p�rsuant to M.S., Sections 469.124 to 489.134. Tax increments may not be <br />used to circumvent existing levy limit law. No tax increment may be used for the acquisition, <br />cons#ructian, renovation, aperation, or maintenance of a building to be used primariIy and reguIarly for <br />conducting the business af a municipality, county, school district, or any other local unit of government <br />or the state or federal go�ernment. This provision does not prohibit the use of revenues derived from tax <br />increments for the construction or renovation of a parking strueture. <br />2. Poolin� Limitations. At least 80 percent of tax increments from the District must be expended on <br />activities in the District or to pay bonds, to the extent that the proceeds of the bonds were used to fnance <br />activities withirz said disirict or to pay, or secure payment of, debt ser�ice on cz-edit enl�anced bonds. Not <br />more than 20 percent of said tax increments may be expended, thraugh a development fund or otherwise, <br />on activities outside of �he Dis�ict except to pay, or secure payment of, debt service on credit enhanced <br />bonds. Far pur�aoses of applying this restrictian, all administrative expenses must he treated as if they <br />were solely for activities outside of the District. <br />3. Five Year Linnitation on Cor�tmitment of Taa� Increments. Tax increments deri�ed frorn the District shall <br />be deemed to have satisfied the 80 percent test set forth in paragraph {2) abave only if the f�e year ruIe <br />set forth in M.S., Section 469.1763, Subd. 3, k►as been satisfied; and beginning with the sixth year <br />followzng certiizcation of the District, 80 percent of said tax increments that remain after expenditures <br />pertnitted under said five year rule must he used only to pay previously committed expenditures or credit <br />City of Arden FEills Tax Increment Financing Pian forTlF District No. 4 2-t3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.