Laserfiche WebLink
neighborhood. Presently, when there is question about who planted a tree, the City takes the <br /> responsibility of removing it when necessary. <br /> The City Code does not address definitively who is responsible for boulevard trees when a <br /> permit for the planting of the tree was not issued, even when it is unlikely that the City planted <br /> the tree. Additionally, the Code is silent on what other types of landscaping materials (i.e.; <br /> retaining walls, planters, boulders, plant materials, irrigation systems) are allowed in the ROW or <br /> not. The City does have a Snow Plowing, Snow Removal, Ice Control Policy (Attachment B) <br /> that addresses some of these items as they pertain to snow plowing, but the Code does not <br /> broadly address this issue. According to the City Attorney (Attachment C), it is within a City's <br /> rights to require items located within the boulevard between the edge of the road and a resident's <br /> property line to be the responsibility of that property owner. <br /> Various communities approach this issue differently; some place the responsibility of <br /> maintaining boulevard trees with residents, others choose to maintain all trees in the ROW <br /> themselves. For example, the City of Minnetonka requires property owners to maintain and be <br /> responsible for boulevard trees; however,they have certain requirements about what is allowed <br /> to be planted or placed in the ROW. Additionally, they retain the authority to prune or remove <br /> vegetation within six feet from the back of the curb and 14 feet above the street for safety <br /> purposes. The City of Shoreview, on the other hand, currently maintains responsibility for all <br /> trees in their ROW. <br /> City Staff believe that it is necessary to clarify within the Code which parties are responsible for <br /> maintaining boulevard trees and vegetation, and most importantly, who is responsible for their <br /> removal in the event of damage or disease. A better understanding of this question is necessary <br /> before the City can create an EAB management plan. It is likely that the coming years will bring <br /> the need for widespread removal of the City's ash tree stock, and proper management of City <br /> resources requires a clear understanding early on of the City's responsibility when it comes to <br /> their removal and possible replacement of trees. <br /> Discussion <br /> City Staff would like to begin working on proposed changes to the City Code regarding ROW. <br /> Staff requests City Council direction on the following questions/issues as they pertain to the <br /> ROW in order for us to begin this process: <br /> 1. Who is responsible for dead, damaged, or diseased trees/vegetation in the ROW? <br /> 2. Should residents be allowed to plant/place things in the ROW adjacent to their homes? If <br /> so, should a permit be required to do so? <br /> 3. What items, if any, should be allowed to be planted or placed in the ROW by residents? <br /> Retaining walls, fences, vegetation, landscaping materials, rocks, irrigation <br /> systems, trees <br /> City of Arden Hills <br /> December 20, 2010, City Council Work Session <br /> llMetro-inet.uslardenhillslPR&PKParksWemoslCouncil Memosll2-20-10-CC Worksession-Memo-ROW Discussion.doc <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br />