My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1A Special TIF Legislation
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
11-10-08-WS
>
1A Special TIF Legislation
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2024 12:54:20 AM
Creation date
2/9/2011 3:10:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
11/10/2008 Council Worksession
General - Type
11/10/2008 Council Worksession
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ron Moorse <br /> Special TIF Legislation for TCAAP <br /> October 15, 2008 <br /> Page 3 <br /> beneficial to the City to offset operational costs of the district, rather than being <br /> made available to the development right away (this will be reviewed as part of the is <br /> financial/resource study to determine the best option for the City and the <br /> development). <br /> d. The City may not establish a hazardous substance subdistrict within the TCAAP <br /> Site. Under current law, if you have a polluted site that meets certain criteria, a <br /> City may establish a hazardous substance subdistrict. What this allows is for the <br /> City to capture 100% of the taxes generated from the site to assist in paying for <br /> costs associated with remediating the site, rather than allowing the City to only <br /> capture the increased tax value from the new development to be available to pay <br /> these costs. As you are aware, the City intends to utilize the base tax value to assist <br /> in paying for any increased costs for City operations related to TCAAP (police, fire, <br /> snow plowing, etc). <br /> e. Extend the term of the district to 30 years after the receipt of the first increment <br /> rather than 25 years. This is to provide the City a safe harbor to make sure it will <br /> be able to pay for the obligations it agrees to. It should be noted that by setting the <br /> term to 30 years that it does not guarantee that the City will grant the developer 30 <br /> years of increment (the amount and duration of assistance is set in the Development <br /> Agreement), it only provides the City flexibility in meeting obligations it deems <br /> appropriate. <br /> 4. Why are we looking at creating special legislation at this time? <br /> As you know, there is a legislative process we have to follow. In order to meet committee <br /> deadlines and have the legislation introduced we need to start the process now. By moving <br /> forward with this concept, it allows staff to meet with the local elected delegation to <br /> discuss it with them and their support or authorship of the bill. In addition, it allows the <br /> City time to meet with key committee chairs and members to discuss the legislation prior - <br /> to its introduction in both the houses. <br /> 5. What is the likelihood of the legislation being approved? <br /> We can never guarantee what the current legislature will or won't approve. However, staff <br /> did meet with Joel Michael of House Research to obtain an initial read on the potential <br /> request and he did not see anything that would raise a"red flag" since many of the terms of <br /> the special legislation have been granted to other cities and projects over the past several <br /> years. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.