Laserfiche WebLink
Stan -- I joined the PTRC 10 years ago because I�ought it afforded me <br />the opportunity to work to beneiit my cornmunity in an area that is <br />very important to me. As I look back on thase �en years, I find very <br />little to show for the wark of the PTRC; as T look %rward, I see <br />nothing t1�at suggests t�at situation will change. After a good deal <br />of deliberation, it is clear to me that the time, thoughY, effort and <br />soul that I expend on #ne PTRC will be better spent elsewhere. As a <br />result, I resign from the PTRC effective immediately. <br />Several factors influence this decision and I suggest they might be of <br />rmpor� as you recruit others to join the PTRC. The most important of <br />these is t�ie inability of the City Council to understand its role in <br />governing the City and the resultant confusion over the role of <br />cornmittees and commissions. For IQ years I have struggled with the <br />con#lict between the identified rale of the PTRC and the Council's <br />dislike For those wha advocate positions it does not wish ta hear. <br />A related factar is the Council's lack of vision and the difficulties <br />that poses for a corn�nittee that tries to pian in meaningful ways for <br />the development of resources into the future. The plans and visions <br />we have advanced, sometimes in collaboration with the Council, have <br />resulted in no new Ciiy investments in partcs and trails, save for the <br />building at Perry Park. The Council is content to wait for others ta <br />fund resources the City needs and should develop. Maybe Bethel, ar <br />the County, or the State, or some developer will add a bit of irail <br />here and there, but tl�at is a far cry from the integrated irail and <br />park system the citizens of the community deserve and t�ie PTRC has <br />advocated for. <br />The Cauncil does not lead. Ins#ead it engages in dynamic foIlowing <br />based largely on its reading of a grandly imper#'ect sannpling of public <br />opinion. The result is that rirne after time a small group af people <br />concerned with Nat In My Backyard issues stifles the developmient of <br />zesources that would beneiit the cornrnon good. Lacicing both courage <br />and �ision, the Council is unable to stand up to these groups, and <br />proposals offered by the PTRC and other committees die on the vine. <br />When we reviewed the 1998 Comprehensive Plan, we found the same issues <br />and deficiencies with which fihe 1'TRC is dealing in 2408. We have <br />prapased solutions from a pedestrian underpass in the reconsiruction <br />oi Hwy. 96 to the bridge over Hwy 51 to an arterial irail system to <br />quarterly community-building events. Nathing happens, time passes, <br />and I wonder why the PTRC e�cists. <br />I have enjoyed watching Michelle Olson bIossam in her new role, and T <br />am grateful for the work she de�otes to the PTRC. However, her work <br />alone is not enough to sustain the FTRC or advance the causes it <br />espouses. <br />This election nolds great promise for change in the United States and <br />in Minnesota, but there is no prospect of change in Arden Hills. The <br />status quo is insu�icient, the Council is intolerant oi advocacy, <br />there is no leadership and the econorruc environtnent is threatening. I <br />can no Ionger justify my involvement. <br />Bill Henry <br />