My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1.A Ramsey County Rice Creek Trailhead Concept and TCAAP North-South Trail Connection Concept
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
11-30-09-TCAAP WS
>
1.A Ramsey County Rice Creek Trailhead Concept and TCAAP North-South Trail Connection Concept
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2024 12:51:12 PM
Creation date
2/14/2011 10:03:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
11-30-09 Council TCAAP Work Session
General - Type
11-30-09 Council TCAAP Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
has expressed support for the City's interest in a north -south trail and has stated that it could be <br />classified as a regional trail connection. A new north -south trail connection through TCAAP <br />would likely be called the "Rice Creek South Regional Trail." <br />There are two general scenarios for a regional trail. The first scenario includes a trail that is <br />integrated into the development, which would be similar to the previous RRLD concept. The <br />second scenario involves obtaining a designated trail corridor, which could be along the eastern <br />side of the property to create an uninterrupted trail corridor. The two scenarios are not <br />necessarily mutually exclusive, though only one would likely be a regional trail. <br />Trail Integrated into the Development <br />A trail integrated into the development would be constructed by a developer as part of a park <br />dedication requirement. The City is the beneficiary of park dedication, though the land for the <br />trail could be transferred to the County if they were willing to accept the property. Since the <br />entire TCAAP property has not been remediated to a residential/recreational standard, it would <br />be reasonable to include a requirement that the City will only accept land that has been <br />remediated to a residential/recreational standard as part of the park dedication requirement. The <br />advantage of a trail integrated into the redevelopment is that it could be designed and located to <br />provide the most benefit to the redevelopment. <br />However, the City would need to be aware of the limits of the park dedication requirement. <br />While the City has quite a bit of leeway in setting a park dedication requirement, it must be in <br />proportion to the need generated by the new development. Additionally, State Statutes require <br />cities to have a plan for how or why the park dedication is needed. The City would want to be <br />cautious in how the park dedication requirement is applied to ensure the most benefit is received. <br />In this case, a regional trail corridor would have a major impact on the City's park dedication <br />requirement. Under this scenario, it would also be difficult to obtain or integrate a wider corridor <br />that allows for a more natural, meandering trail. <br />Dedicated Trail Corridor <br />The second scenario involves a dedicated trail corridor that would likely be transferred through <br />special legislation prior to the public sale. The trail corridor could be along the eastern edge of <br />the property from Highway 96 to the Rice Creek North Regional Trail and Wildlife Corridor, <br />which would provide for an uninterrupted trail. Other options could include a trail corridor along <br />the western side of the property, though that may be less inviting with the adjacent freeways. A <br />third option could be an undefined corridor of a specific size that the City selects after the <br />auction and during the redevelopment process. The undefined corridor option would provide the <br />most flexibility, but additional research is needed to determine if it is feasible. <br />Mr. Mack has suggested that a dedicated trail corridor should be no less than 150 feet wide, <br />though there could be some flexibility depending on the location. Generally speaking, a wider <br />City ofArden Hills <br />P: IAdminlCounciMgendas & Packet Information 1200911-30-09 TCAAP WorksessionPacket lnformationl IA 113009 - CC Memo -RC <br />Trailhead and Rice Creek Trail. doc <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.