My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-30-09 -TCAAP WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
11-30-09 -TCAAP WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2024 12:21:33 AM
Creation date
2/14/2011 10:18:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
11-30-09 Council TCAAP Work Session
General - Type
11-30-09 Council TCAAP Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL TCAAP )YORK SESSION-NOVEMBER_30, 2009 5 <br /> A. Ramsey County Rice Creek Trailhead Concept and TCAAP North- <br /> South Trail Connection Concept (continued) <br /> Councilmember Grant stated he did not want the trail running through some of <br /> the highly contaminated portions of TCAAP and having the City assume ownership <br /> of the property. The City would then have to apply for grants in order to clean the <br /> sites. He felt a better option would be to work with a developer and use park <br /> dedication to complete the trail corridor. <br /> Councilmember Holmes stated the western trail route would need very little clean <br /> up and that she felt it would benefit the City to secure a corridor prior to the <br /> auction and begin seeking grants or special funding. <br /> Councilmember Grant indicated a trail to the west would run along the highway <br /> and that commercial properties may want this exposure. <br /> Councilmember Holden agreed with Councilmember Grant that the property <br /> would create a risk to the City and that the enviromnental attorney should be <br /> contacted regarding the concept. She felt it should be transferred from the City to <br /> the County if possible to allow for access from north to south. <br /> Mr. Mack stated he would like to see the City secure the land. The County would <br /> then pursue making this a part of a regional trail and secure funding for <br /> development of the trail. The County would either enter into a joint powers <br /> agreement with the City or take ownership of the corridor. <br /> Councilmember Holmes asked if the County would be responsible for the <br /> cleanup. <br /> Mr. Mack stated the County would have the same concerns the City would when <br /> addressing land cleanup for the trail corridor. <br /> Mayor Harpstead indicated he was partial to the eastern location of the trail <br /> because it would become an uninterrupted trail. His only concern was the high <br /> levels of traffic from County Road 96. <br /> Mayor Harpstead stated he felt that setting aside a portion of land in advance of <br /> the land sale for this trail corridor would be an advantage to the City. He suggested <br /> the Council consider this. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.