Laserfiche WebLink
projects and market conditions, the project has essentially been on hold since the last update was <br />provided to Council in May 2008. <br />Staff has kept in touch with the adjacent townhome association and interested residents to assure <br />them that although the process has been on hold, the City remains committed to the community <br />planning and RFP process. Additionally, people were informed that there would be time for <br />public review and comment before the RFP is approved. <br />Project Timeline Options <br />While the market has changed considerably since the last development proposal was reviewed in <br />the summer of 2006, the City has received a few phone calls from developers with interest in the <br />property. Potential developers are informed of the community planning process to prepare the <br />RFP. <br />Although other projects have a higher priority in the coming months (i.e. rental regulations), it <br />should be possible to prepare a working draft RFP for Council and public review as early as the <br />June work session pending room on that agenda. When last reviewed, the RFP process was <br />leading toward a primarily residential use on the property. The issue regarding access to <br />Hamline Avenue requires discussion as do a few other topics that could be discussed along with <br />a working RFP draft. <br />The housing market has experienced a severe decline in recent months; however, there has been <br />activity in multi-family housing in the metropolitan area. There a metro-wide need for <br />affordable housing and it may be possible to have a percentage of any development include units <br />with prices in the affordable housing range.Office development, many types of retail, and <br />condos/townhomes could prove to be difficult at this time. <br />Once staff drafts the RFP, it would be brought to a work session and open for public review and <br />comment prior to that. After the RFP is reviewed and approved by the City Council, it would be <br />released to potential developers. The RFP would list the requirements set by the City, and <br />developers would be able to submit proposals that meet the requirements listed in the RFP. The <br />proposals would then be evaluated by the City for compliance with the RFP and, if a proposal <br />meets the requirements set by the City, it can be accepted. Any project would then go through <br />the normal City review process, which would likely include a planned unit development. <br />Staff can move forward with preparing the RFP for Council review; however, there may be some <br />merit in delaying the project pending changes in the economy. Since the sale value of the <br />property has likely fallen, we may get fewer developers responding to an RFP. If the responses <br />do work to meet the City’s goals, the City would not have to accept a proposal. <br />City of Arden Hills <br />City Council Work Session for April 20, 2009 <br />\\Ahdocs1\ah\AHdata\Planning\Development Projects\Former City Hall-Public Works Site Reuse\042009 - CC Work Session - Old City Hall <br />RFP Update.doc <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br />