Laserfiche WebLink
exist a few stands of good quality significant trees. A formal application for development would <br />require a tree preservation plan. <br />Through early discussions with the developer, it became clear that there is a conflict between the <br />City's Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan in regards to the required density of R -1 property <br />in the City. The City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan guides the future land use of the property as <br />Low Density Residential, which is defined as residential property developed at three to five units <br />per net acre. In contrast, the City's Zoning Code caps the allowed density in the R -1 District at <br />three units per net acre. Furthermore, the Code requires a minimum of 14,000 square feet per R- <br />1 lot, which does not allow for a density of three units per net acre. <br />If the applicant develops the property in accordance with the City's Subdivision and Zoning <br />Ordinances, they would need a CPA to allow less than three units per acre. In contrast, if the <br />property were developed in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan requirements at a higher <br />density, flexibility from the City's Zoning Code would be necessary. In the case of the latter, the <br />applicant would most likely apply for a Master and Final PUD so that the City might grant the <br />necessary flexibilities from the Code without the need for variances. <br />At a January 31, 2011, work session with the City Council, Pulte Group presented two concept <br />plan scenarios. One at a higher density option that met the requirements of the Comprehensive <br />Plan, but would have required a PUD application for zoning flexibility; and a second lower <br />density option that met the requirements of the Zoning Code, but would require a CPA. The City <br />Council gave direction that the lower density option was preferred, and Pulte Group has since <br />moved forward with preparing a development application package in line with this direction. <br />Pulte Group hosted a community meeting on February 8, 2011, to discuss the lower density <br />proposed concept plan with residents around the development area. Pulte took feedback from <br />residents at this meeting and used it to complete their development application. <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process <br />When there is a conflict between a city's comprehensive plan and a zoning code, the city is <br />required to amend the zoning code to comply with the comprehensive plan, unless the city <br />approves an amendment to the comprehensive plan. All comprehensive plan amendments must <br />also be approved by the Metropolitan Council. Staff has been in communication with the City's <br />Sector Representative at the Metropolitan Council regarding this property. The Sector <br />Representative has indicated that the Metropolitan Council could be supportive of a <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment that would allow the City to reduce the minimum density <br />required on property guided for Low Density Residential given the higher density that is <br />anticipated on the TCAAP property. <br />City of Arden Hills <br />Planning Commission Work Session for March 9, 2011 <br />IlMetro- inet. uslardenhills\Planning\Planning CasesI2011111 -004 Pulte Concept Review103 -09 -11 PC report Pulte Development Concept <br />Review.doc Page 2 of 4 <br />