My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-06-11-PC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Commission Packets
>
2010-2019
>
PC Packets 2011
>
04-06-11-PC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2015 3:15:34 PM
Creation date
4/4/2011 9:44:59 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION—March 9, 2011 5 <br /> 3.A. Planning Case 11-004; Concept Plan Review; Pulte Development Group; 4500 Snelling <br /> Avenue North—Not a Public Hearing (continued) <br /> Commissioner Holewa clarified the PUD process would provide the most protection to <br /> the wetlands. <br /> City Planner Beekman stated this was correct. <br /> Commissioner Modesette explained she would like to know what Rice Creek Watershed <br /> has to say about the wetlands and the current proposal before she supports increasing the <br /> buffer area. <br /> Chair Larson explained the 20-foot setback and using signs to identify the wetland areas <br /> should be adequate for protecting them. He expressed concerns about having the homes <br /> closer to the road and how this would look when compared to the surrounding <br /> neighborhoods. <br /> City Planner Beekman stated the last couple of developments the City has approved have <br /> had reductions in front yard setbacks. The reduced setbacks do give the neighborhood a <br /> different look but the City has not seen any adverse effects of this. <br /> Commissioner Holewa pointed out the homes on the other side of the street from the <br /> proposed development would have the standard 40-foot setbacks. <br /> • Commissioner Modesette stated it would be helpful to have a better understanding of how <br /> the hydrologic drainage pattern and how this is accommodated in the future for the April <br /> 6, 2011 meeting. <br /> Commissioner Hames requested Staff to discuss with the applicant the possibility of <br /> increasing the rear setbacks so that the project would not have to through the PUD <br /> process. This would maintain the 40-foot front yard setbacks and protect the wetlands in <br /> the back. A 40-foot setback does allow residents to construct a front porch_ which is <br /> something the City would like to encourage. <br /> Chair Larson closed the floor to Commissioner comments. <br /> City Planner Beekman clarified the Planning Commission would be interested in a buffer <br /> for the wetlands while maintaining the 40-foot front yard setbacks. <br /> B. Planning -1 <br /> Case 'c1 005Tr-eliminary and T.• l Plitt, d--Manic,--and Final PUD-; <br /> Trinity Luther-on Chureh; 3245 New Brighton Road—TABLED to April 6, 2011 <br /> Commissioner Holewa moved and Commissioner Thompson seconded a motion to <br /> Table Planning Case 11-005; Preliminary and Final Plat, and Master and Final <br /> PUD; Trinity Lutheran Church; 3245 New Brighton Road to the April 6, 2011, <br /> Planning Commission Meeting. The motion carried unanimously (6-0). <br /> UNFINISHED AND NEW BUSINESS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.