Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—MARCH 21, 2011 4 <br /> After some discussion, the consensus of the Council was to grant a 1% increase effective January <br /> 1 and revisit this topic in July. Staff was directed to place this matter under Consent on the <br /> Council's March 28 h agenda. <br /> 2.1) I-694/TH 51 Interchange Project <br /> Public Works Director Maurer explained that on February 9, Senator Goodwin and <br /> Representative Knuth held a meeting with MnDOT, Ramsey County, and Arden Hills officials to <br /> discuss the I-694/TH 51 Interchange Project. He reviewed a follow-up letter from MnDOT <br /> addressing the City's 14 conditions for denying municipal consent. He also reviewed a letter from <br /> Joe Lux of Ramsey County clarifying three of the conditions addressed in MnDOT's letter. He <br /> stated the key points in each letter are: <br /> I. On Condition #2, MnDOT states that the City is no longer pursuing the noise wall so - <br /> they will remove it from the construction plans. Staff has talked to MnDOT and <br /> informed them that this is not what was said at the meeting on February 9. Staff <br /> reminded MnDOT that we indicated our feeling that the City would forego the noise <br /> wall if freeing up approximately $1,000,000 of MnDOT funding would help with <br /> MnDOT funding needed traffic improvements on Lexington Avenue. <br /> 2. On Condition#3, regarding using excess material generated on the project for building <br /> berms to help with noise mitigation; MnDOT gave a more detailed explanation at the <br /> meeting that the need to build storm water ponds, limited right-of-way, and topography <br /> of the excess right-of-way made it impossible to build berms of sufficient length and <br /> height to provide significant noise mitigation. With this more detailed explanation, it <br /> was agreed that building of berms was no longer needed. <br /> 3. On Condition 45, MnDOT basically has given the same answer about potential City <br /> costs with their project. Ramsey County's letter clarifies even hither potential cost <br /> from a County project on Lexington Avenue. It appears that the City costs for both <br /> projects will be modest. <br /> 4. Condition #6 deals with MnDOT committing funds to help Ramsey County with <br /> needed improvements on Lexington Avenue due to the interchange project. Staff has <br /> had several conversations with Mr. McBride and Jim Tolaas regarding this issue. Mr. <br /> McBride has been very clear that MnDOT policy prohibits them from committing in <br /> writing to having funding available for the County project as the funds come from a <br /> competitive program at MnDOT. Mr. McBride did tell staff that MnDOT would do <br /> everything it could to help the County with the Lexington Avenue improvements. <br /> Staff asked Mr. McBride to call Jim Tolaas to discuss this and then ask Mr. Tolaas to <br /> call the City. Staff did receive a phone call from Mr. Tolaas stating that he talked to <br /> Mr. McBride and that the County is fully committed to making the necessary <br /> improvements to Lexington Avenue and they feel MnDOT will help with funding. <br /> 5. Condition 47 deals with making improvements to the Lexington Avenue Bridge to <br /> lengthen the left turn lanes. MnDOT has committed to making this change including <br /> the adjustments to the signal systems at each end of the bridge and to do the work <br />