Laserfiche WebLink
-3- <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />7. <br />E�I <br />Marclz 20 meeti.�g . . <br />�� , <br />?fr. Kattr� etmted that thc commercial erea ha$ �ot been deteramined; the apartmente, as <br />propoaed, would conaist af.��Q 12-unit and_four 18-unit b�i,�dinAs with approxim�te <br />monthly rentmis of $225-�250. i'h� townhouses would cast app�aximetely $30,0�0 or �are <br />each aad ther� wov�d be ninetean b-unit and thirtv-four 3-un�t build n�. 1'here would <br />be gaxagea. €or the townhouses beneath the units. Total nuiaber of residential unita pro- <br />poaed was 312. Further plans are to be presentcd to �he Planning Cammis�ion �or can- <br />aideratio� a't a later d�te �nd no action was taken at this tiuie. Case No. 71-43 <br />Case Na. 72-�i - 5 ec �1 Use Permit Re uesti for a Pr�vate Teanis C1ub-- T�door Tennis Inc. <br />A-public hearing was scheduled on this pxaposal at the �pecial Plannfng Co�uaission <br />meeting of March 20, 1972. <br />Case No. 72-12 - Subd3visfon Variance Reques� - Wm. Wegleitner and S�.tzmark Ski Shop - <br />The Pl�anning Corar�,ission reco�uended approval of the variance request rera►ittin� the <br />addition of a 50 ft. x 283 ftr 2lY'C�1 tp the East of the resent ro ert , all as shown <br />in Lh� site plan previouslp pr�sented to the Commission. <br />Gase No. 70-�+ - Minnesot8 Hi�hway 52 - Propoaed Reconstruction Throu�h Arden Hills <br />A numbex of news articles from the M�nnespalis �ribune relating to highway noise �nd its <br />e�fect on HUA f�nancing and noise standaxds wexe p�resented to the Copnnisaian. HUD - <br />Noi�e Assessment Guidelines were diacussed and the sound was me�sured at the intersection <br />of Countv � and Snellinr� Avenue at 4:30 P.M. After discussion the Couaniasion recoa3me�.ded <br />that the Counci,l reconsider the installat�on of a traff ic si�nal at the interaection_of.. <br />Highway 5Z and Snelling and �Hatnline Avenues because the installation coul.d develop sn <br />i.ncreased noise problem. It also reco�ended that the Councii request the Hi�hway Devart- <br />ment to study the noise leveis at the inters�ction and the implicatia�.s i.f a traffic <br />signal is insta�l�ed as compared with a reducti.an nf speed and/or add�.tional signs. <br />Case No. 72-9 - Pro�osed Ordinance p.tnendin� Ordinance No 9$. Tabled to meeting of <br />March 20, 1972. <br />Case No. 72-1� - Waste Control a�d Re'stulations -'�here was a review of a let�er concerning <br />Sewex and Waste Cozzt�ol Rules and Regulatians fqr the Metropo�itan Disposal 5ystem whi.ch <br />was in turn referreci to the Fublic Works Committee and the Engineer for � r�:port �t the <br />Mr o Glenzz �eggin,, Chaixman <br />1$ I8 Grams ie Roa d <br />Mr. �orrest Bear <br />13�5 T�,11ex �I.$ue <br />Mrs. Ruth Cadweli. <br />1386 Skiles Lane <br />Mrs . Ra�nvna Lindbom <br />40q8 N. Fa irview Avenue <br />Mrs. Nancy Mc�ntosh <br />1975 Jexro�d Avenue <br />PARiCS AND RECREATION C�ITTEE - 1972 <br />Mr. Robert Anderson <br />1,357 F1oral Drive <br />Mr. IGenneth Boss <br />13�.5 Red Fox Rvad <br />Mr. Thomas La Nasa <br />3153 Shoreline E,ane <br />Mrs. Phillipa Lindq�ist <br />11J�� Ingerson Ttoad <br />Mr. Larry Brodle <br />1741 Venus Avenue <br />ORI7TNAI�iCE REVIEW CQ�IMFT'�EE - ].972 <br />Mx. John Sul�ivan, Cha�.rtnan <br />�429 SkiZes i,ane <br />Mr. David Jahnston <br />�78Q Glenview Avenue <br />Mr. Robert Smith <br />I850 Venus Averiue <br />