Laserfiche WebLink
EDC Minutes <br />June 22, 2011 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />EDC members commented that topics of interest to the business community include an update on <br />the stadium proposal and TCAAP development, an update on other development within the City, <br />information on the City's finances and the 2012 budget, and the status of the B -2 District <br />Implementation Plan. <br />EDC members suggested that a multi -media approach to marketing would be most effective with <br />the business community. Marketing efforts will utilize the City newsletter, website, and bulletin. <br />The event will be announced at a City Council meeting. An advertisement will be posted in the <br />Shoreview Arden Hills Bulletin. The Arden Hills — Shoreview rotary will be contacted and <br />asked for assistance in publicizing the event. Although the State of the City event will be <br />oriented towards the business community, residents are welcome to attend the free event. <br />Staff will work to plan the event. An update will be provided to the EDC at the next meeting. <br />B. Draft Tax Increment Financing (TIF) White Paper <br />The EDC discussed the draft TIF White Paper prepared by the Financial Planning and Analysis <br />Committee. Commissioner Erickson commented that he liked the idea of guidelines, although he <br />did not know if a point system would be objective. He also suggested that affordable housing be <br />removed from the list of regional goals since in order to accommodate new affordable housing <br />development, the City would need to rezone land that was not appropriate for housing <br />development. <br />Commissioner Davidson commented that the City has historically been very conservative with <br />TIF financing. He was concerned that the point system proposed in the draft White Paper would <br />make redevelopment more difficult. <br />City Administrator Klaers commented that the City may want to compare the proposed TIF <br />spending guideline with the percentage of tax capacity in TIF districts in similar communities <br />such as fully developed suburbs with a mix of commercial and residential development. <br />C. Gateway Signs <br />Staff reported that the City Council had reviewed sign styles and costs and provided feedback to <br />staff that a sign with a masonry base was preferred. The cost of a masonry base sign is estimated <br />to be $20,000 to $25,000 per sign. Staff is working on the draft 2012 — 2016 Capital <br />Improvement Plan (CIP). The draft plan, subject to revision by the City Council, includes a <br />$65,000 budget for signs in 2012. This would include the City's share of $15,000 for a sign on <br />the southwest quadrant of Lexington Avenue and County Road E, as well as two additional <br />signs. <br />EDC members commented that sign location priorities were established at a previous meeting, <br />and suggested that staff check the minutes to determine the recommended location priorities. <br />