My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-11-11-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
07-11-11-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2011 9:23:25 AM
Creation date
8/10/2011 9:22:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Regular City Council Minutes
General - Type
Regular City Council Minutes
Category
Regular City Council Minutes
Date
7/11/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL — July, 11, 2011 5 <br />6.A. Highway 96 /TH 10 Interstate Project — Public Hearing (continued) <br />the City a copy of the approved layout for the proposed improvement. According to the Mn/DOT <br />Municipal Consent guide, the City must hold a public hearing on the final layout for the purpose <br />of considering granting Municipal Consent. State Statute requires Municipal Consent because the <br />project alters access. After the conclusion of the public hearing, the Council has 90 days to take <br />action on the request for Municipal consent. The Council has three options: approve Municipal <br />Consent, disapprove Municipal Consent, or disapprove Municipal Consent with conditions. If the <br />Council takes no action within 90 days after the public hearing, Municipal Consent is deemed to <br />be granted. <br />Mr. Jim Tolaas, Director and County Engineer, Ramsey County Department of Public Works, <br />explained that the volume of traffic per day entering the Highway 10 /Highway 96 intersection area <br />was 58,600 vehicles in 2006 and is projected to be over 80,000 by 2030. He outlined the major <br />features of the project including Highway 96 will be lowered and will be routed under Highway <br />10, temporary ramps on the north side of Highway 96 will provide access to and from the north, <br />Highway 96 will be reconstructed as a four -lane roadway, Prior Avenue will be realigned to line <br />up with Round Lake Boulevard, new traffic signals will be installed at Round Lake <br />Boulevard /Prior Avenue and at the southbound Highway 10 ramp at Highway 96, a multi -use trail <br />will be built on the south side of Highway 96, a sidewalk will be built on the north side of <br />Highway 96, existing accesses along Highway 10 will remain in place, and there is flexibility in <br />the road design to accommodate a variety of uses when TCAAP redevelops. He clarified that the <br />project is being coordinated with the improvements that are being planned for I -694 west of <br />Lexington Avenue. He added that even though the surface of Highway 10 will change, it is not a <br />long -term noise abatement solution. <br />Councilmember Holmes stated that it would be safe for people riding their bikes to cross at the <br />light on Highway 96 and the trail and sidewalk would be safe. <br />Mr. Tolaas, stated the intersection would be equipped with the newest ADA equipment for <br />pedestrian access. There will be bituminous surface trail on the south side of Highway 96 that <br />will go to the regional trail in White Bear Lake, and a concrete sidewalk on the north side. <br />Bicycles can travel along the sidewalk but at a slower speed than they would be able to on a trail. <br />Councilmember Holden asked if there were any trails planned from Round Lake Road to I -3 5 W. <br />Mr. Tolaas stated the structure at I -3 5 W is not adequate to allow for the extension of the trail <br />from Highway 96 to Round Lake Road. If a new structure is put in place, the trail will likely be <br />extended. At this time there are plans for redecking this structure and aligning the lanes to make <br />them narrower to allow for one additional east bound lane. <br />Councilmember Holden stated the addition of a lane and not widening the bridge would put <br />more pressure on pedestrians trying to cross at this location. <br />Mr. Tolaas clarified the realignment of the lanes would not change the outside lanes where the <br />pedestrians currently cross. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.