4C, Approve Planning Case #11-015 for a Site Plan Review at 375

Home Browse Search

reasons for the deniaL If the Planning Cammission recommends approval af this Site Plan Review, Staff recommends the following seven condi�ions: 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by t11e conditions of approval. Any s�gnificant changes to these plans, as deternained by the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission. 2. The applicant shall obtain a11 necessary grading and building perrnits prior to beginning construction or demoiition on the site. 3. The applicant sha11 use best managemex�t pxactices (BMPs} ta control erosion at aIl times during construction. 4. The height of the structuxe shall not exceed 15-feet. 5. The applicant shall obtain approval or waiver from the Rice Creek Watershed District priar to the issuance of any building pern�its. 6. The s#ructure sha11 confoz-�xi ta all other regulations in the City Code. 7. The property shall be limited to a singie accessory structure. Chair Larson opened the floor to Commissioner coxnments. Chair Larson stated the code allaws �or two accessory structures, at 728 square-feet each, on this property. He asked if approving the 908 square-foot structure would xeplace this anc� al�ow for jusi ihe single accessory structure on the property. City Planner Beekman stated the applicant wo�d not be able to build a second accessory structure on the property to nn.ake up the difference in square foatage that would have been allowed with the two st�ruuctures: Chair Larson suggested Staff include permit ready drawings with the infonnation presented to the Planning Commission for approval. This will ensure the Plaru�ng Commission is approving a plan that is meeting the req�irements of the application and not encroaching on property lines Community Development Intern Anderson clarified the applicant had provided a written statement showing the structure would be 11 feet from the setback. Chair Larson stated there were window� in th� second story of the structure. He asked what this area would be used for. Mx. Brian Burgeson, 3759 New Brighton Road, Arden Hills, stated this area would be used as a maz� cave area and far storage. He also stated the lot pins were easily �ocated and the side property lines were well established. Chair Larson stated if this area was goix�g to be used as a second dwelling this would requzxe an additional process through the City.