Laserfiche WebLink
_ __ ... . <br />� <br />� ��� <br />1V�NIQRAND�FM <br />DATE: March 17, 2fl I� <br />TQ: Pa�rick Klaex�, City Admi�xisirator <br />F�UM: Sue Ivez^son, Director of Finance and Admi�.istrative Services <br />SUBJECT: CO�.A Analysis for 2011 <br />In the �.0 ���udge� �araa�ss we put $20,2I 1 in the General Fur�d Cantingency for salary �ncreases <br />as we did nat have the union cn�tract settled. Since we have nQw s�i;tled tY►e union contrac# for <br />�e years 2�11— 2412, we now know tha� the increase �ox unian em�Ifly�es will b� �°la £or 2011. <br />"You have asked rne what tl�e i�np�.ct on the budget would be for a 1°/a i�c�rease re#ro to January l, <br />��1� fallpwed hy a 1% incre.�se on Ju�y 1, 2011 for the nan-union employees. Yc�u have a�so <br />asked wh�.t the impact on the budget would be for a 1.5% increase re�ra to da�nuary �, 201 I�vr <br />ihe non-union employees. <br />i'he effect of a 1°ro increase on Janua�y lst and July 15# wauld be as foflows: <br />Ge ne ral <br />Fund <br />196 Jan 1 $ 6,lOS <br />1� Jul 1 3,548 <br />Tatal Increase � $ 9,656 <br />'�`he ��fe�t o�` a 1.5% incre�ase on January 1St woulc� be: <br />General <br />Fund <br />Jan � $ 9,5�2 <br />��tal $ 9,502 <br />Xn eff�et, either way it amoraa��,s to a 1,5% increase for the year, but the advantages of the first <br />aptxon (1°�0 on .lanuary 1st and 1°/a on July 1�} would be that it adjusts the pay scales for nan- <br />unian ezxiployees to "catch up" �ar what k�appen�d last yeas� when fhe unio� employee gat a 3°/a <br />increase and tb�e non��nian emplayees got a%. This would resttlt in the no�x-union employees' <br />pay scalas oniy i% behind the uzzxon.'s at th� enr� ofthe year. <br />