Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />� ��S <br />M�MORANDUM <br />DATL�: Ma.rch � 7, 2011 <br />TO: Pa€rick Klaers, Ciiy AdministratQr <br />��t4t1'I: �ue Ivez�san, Director of F�nar�ee and Admi�istra�ive Services <br />SUBJECT: C��A Anaiysis for 2011 <br />in the 24I X B�dget �rocess we put $20,211 � the General Furtd Cor�tinge�cy for salary increases <br />as we did not k�ave !he wuan con�ract settled. Since we �a�e now settled the union eontrac� far <br />the years 2011— �012, W0 riOW IC[lOW fi.�1ai fi.ile iF3CI'f,�.S� �4�' 1�I11Qt3 �Xi1�IQ�l�eS VVI�� �?� ��Io �Oi �aI 1. <br />Xou have asked me what the impact on the budg�t wo�3.d be for a. l% incz�ease retro ta �anuary 1, <br />20t� fo�lvwed by a 1°lo increase on July l., 2011 for t�e norz-�czion ernp�oyees. You have alsa <br />as�ced wi�at the ir�pact an the budget wau�d be #'or a I.5°fa increase retra to Jan�ary l, 20�I for <br />the non-uc�ian e�nployees. <br />The effect of a i% increase on January Ist and ]�1y 1S` would be as follo�vs: <br />General <br />Fund <br />1%Jat� 1 $ 6,1fl$ <br />1% Jul � 3,548 <br />Totallncrease $ 9,656 <br />Tl�e effect flf a 1.5°10 iunerease o� Jan�ary lst would be: <br />General <br />Fund <br />Jan 1 $ 9,SU2 <br />Total $ 3,SD2 <br />In efFect, either way it amoun.�,S t4 a 1.S°14 increase for th� year, but the advaritages of the fixs� <br />opiion {i°/a on �'anuary IS` and 1% oz� Juiy i�) wo�d be that it adjusts the pay scales for non- <br />union ern�loyees to "catch-up" for wha�t happened last year when the union employee gat a 3°la <br />increase a�d the n�n-unian efnployees got 0%. This would result iu the t�on-union employees' <br />pay scal�s only i°/a hehind the �on's at the end of �e year. <br />