My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4H, Wage Increase for Non-Union Employees
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
08-29-11-R
>
4H, Wage Increase for Non-Union Employees
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2024 10:38:58 AM
Creation date
8/26/2011 8:25:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
City Council Meeting August 29, 2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In conversat�on:s with Councilmem�ers earlier this year, this 2Q10 union/non-unian wage <br />adjustment discrepancy is what t�e Co�nciI wa�ted to try to "correct" zn 2011 _ This possibiiity <br />was discussed du�ring the Unior� contract negotiations so that ihere wautd be no surprises after a <br />settlert�ent was reached. At Che March 21 �` Work Sessio�, Councilmember wanted to kc�ow what <br />t�e surrounding cities were doing and how we compared. <br />The following char� of "non-exempt increases" shows t�e cities in the area that responded to our <br />request, b�t there is na "apple-to-apple" comparison. Foilowing the c�art is a surx�r�-�ary of what <br />we have found surveyirtg these cities. <br />iotallncr <br />City 2�10 2t]11 Over 2 Yrs <br />ArcEen HilEs 0.0°10 1.4% 1_0% <br />Litile Canada 0.0% 2.0% Z.0% <br />Mourids View 0.0°� fl.0% 0.4% <br />Mapiewaod 3At fl.0°� 3_0% <br />Shoreview �.0% 1.0% 2.Q% <br />St. Anthony Vil�age 0.0% 1.5% 1.5% <br />Rosevilie O.Ci/ l.q�/ 2.0/ <br />Forest Lake 0.0% 1_5% 1.5% <br />fVew Brighton 0.�% Q.0% 0_�% <br />+ Maplewood had given a large increase in 2010 of 3°/a and are gir�i�tg no increases <br />in 2011. <br />St. Anthony has �on-��ian emptoyees and t�ee unior�s. PoIice and Public warks <br />eact� had a ane-year cantract with 2% increases for 2011, Fire has a two-year <br />contraci with a I.S% increase aoth in 24I1 and �01�., ar�ci the non-uz�io� receivea <br />1.S%. The St_ Anthony City CounciI has given staff direction to baiance thc <br />increase att�ong the various units so t�at they all have a 3% increase over a two- <br />year period as they do not want one bargaining unit or employee group to r�ceive <br />�igher salary increases t�tar� another. <br />Shoreview gave 1% only to their employees i� t�e top step ancE others received a <br />ste� increase for both 2010 and 201 i. <br />If we were to use the St_ Amhony example, we cu�-rentiy iook like the followir�g table_ <br />Tota I Incr <br />City 201Q 2011 O�er 2 Yrs <br />Pu6iic Worlcs-Union 3.0% O.Q°/a 3.0% <br />lVflll-UilfDri d.fl% l.Q°� �..Q� <br />In looking at the Shoreview exarnple, we look like the foIiowing #able {we have included 20 i 2 <br />a�d 2013 for future reference): <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.