Laserfiche WebLink
Memo <br />City Council <br />2012 Pro�osed Preti�ninary Budget and Tax Levy <br />3 <br />Home Market Value $ 76,fl00 $'[ 50,000 $ 272,80t3 $ 350,000 $ 500,0�0 <br />Markei Value Exclusion 30,400 23,7�0 12,fi88 5,74U - <br />Market Value Afer ExcEusion $ 45,800 $ t2�,260 $ 260,112 $ 344,26Q $ 500,�00 <br />Taxabie Valu� - OLD $ 760 $ 1,5DQ $ 2,728 $ 3,500 $ 5,000 <br />Ta�ra6ie Value - NEW $ 45� $ 1,2�3 $ 2,801 $ 3,443 $ 5,000 <br />Difference in Taxable Value -40.U°10 -15.8°/o -4.7°/a -1.6°/a 0.0°/o <br />In order to evaluate the true irnpac# �o the residez�tial property owner, you need to take into <br />accaun# the decrease in fiscal disparities, t�e cl�ange in the taxable value before tl�e MVE, ar�d <br />the effects oi fihe new MVE progra�n. To help illustrate this, the faliowing table shows the <br />impact to the residential property owner due t4 the reduction in fisca� disparzty dollars, changes <br />in the assess market value, and changes in the City's overa�l ta�cabie value before t�►e new <br />legislation. This would be an "app�es-ta-apples" comparfson as it is the sazne formula used in <br />2Q11. <br />Pay 20t2 MV 500,000�1.0 % (87 x E) + 76,000�.40% <br />XQ934 rem � 1.25%a (612 x D} - rean�.69% (G} x% (F) -(H) <br />Estimater! Ta�c Distnct rate as % oTto3al rate: �:-,,'�ti�:%�:.':'�''�.', <br />�50;OQ0:`,. 1,500 $365_OB $237.40 $49_85 $3i5.21 <br />F`�:::2�2;860:'" 2,728 $663.91 $12fi.88 $26.64 $637_27 <br />350;D00; 3,500 $851.80 $57.40 $12.95 $839.75 <br />$'I <br />� <br />Annual Increase Monthly incr <br />($2_33) $ (0.19� <br />{$4.06) $ (0.34) <br />($S. i 8} $ (0.43) <br />{$id.04) $ (�.84} <br />($93.84} $ (4.15} <br />