My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8A, US 10 & Highway 96 Municipal Consent
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
09-26-11-R
>
8A, US 10 & Highway 96 Municipal Consent
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2024 10:40:40 AM
Creation date
9/23/2011 4:12:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
Sept 26, 2011 Reg City Council Meeting
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />EN HILLS <br />MEMORANDUM <br />DATE: Septe�nber 26, 2011 <br />TO: HonorabCe Mayor and City Councilmembers <br />Patrick Klaers, City Administrator � <br />FROM: Terry Maurer, PubIic Works Director � <br />SUBJECT: US 141Hwy 96 Improvement-Municipal Cons�nt ResoIution <br />Back�round <br />Ramsey County is pro�osing an ir�terchange improvement to the intersection of US 10 <br />az�d Hury 96. Eaxlier this year the City was presen�ed with a Mn/DOT staff appxoved <br />layout and Municipal Consent was requested. A Public Hearing was held by the City <br />Council on July 11, 2011. Also, this project was discussed wiih representatives of <br />Ramsey County at work sessions on Apri125, 2011, Augus� 15, 2011, and most recently <br />September 19, 2011. At the last work sessian it was the consensus of the City Council <br />that a Resolu�ion Disapproving the Final Layout of the US i OIHwy 95 Yanprovernent� <br />with Conditions was appropriate. The foizr conditions the City Council wanted attached <br />to the resolution dealt with the following iiems: <br />�. City ar�d County review of �he siaging of the projeci relaiive to the current I-694 <br />improvement io ensure movement of local traff c was considered. <br />2. Revisiting the noise modeling for the SW quadrant looking at different Iength and <br />height noise walls to see if any meet the cost-effective criteria. <br />3. Increasing the height of the barrier proposed to be placed adjacent to Lakeshore <br />Place. <br />4. Review of the noise wall alignment at the west corner of the ma�ufactured home <br />park to ensure ii will be in the proper place for a further extension along I-35 W. <br />Attached is a Resoluiion that wouid take this action. <br />Council_Ac�ion Requested <br />Adopt the attached 2011-448 Resolution Disapproving Finai Layout of US l OIHwy 96 <br />with Conditions. <br />City Council Meeting <br />P:1AdzninlCouncillAgendas & Packet Information120 1 119-2 6-i i ReguIarlPacket Informationl4-26- <br />I �USlOHwy96MunicipalConsent.doc <br />Page 1 of I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.