Laserfiche WebLink
EDC Minutes <br />August 24, 2011 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />depends on the type of district and total eligible TIF costs, but there is a maximum duration of <br />around twenty -six years. <br />Community Development Director Hutmacher summarized Staffs findings that the City <br />currently has 3.73% of its tax capacity captured by TIF districts, which will increase to 5% once <br />Presbyterian Homes moves forward. Arden Hills is unique since 50% of the City's total tax <br />capacity is from Commercial /Industrial (C /I) properties, which is very high compared to most <br />cities in the metro. Only Fridley and Bloomington have similar proportions of tax capacity from <br />C/I properties. Chair von Holtum asked if the proposed stadium could affect these numbers. <br />Councilmember Holden and Community Development Director Hutmacher explained that the <br />stadium would be tax - exempt but the 170 -acre section of the property that is proposed to be <br />privately developed would be taxable. If anything, the City's total tax capacity could increase. <br />Community Development Director Hutmacher went over reasons that C/I properties are <br />beneficial to cities. These developments provide jobs and their higher tax capacity relieves the <br />burden on residential property owners. Staff would like direction as to whether to recommend to <br />the City Council that the City's TIF- captured tax capacity benchmark match the state average or <br />comparable cities. The EDC was provided with a spreadsheet listing Twin Cities municipalities <br />with populations between 2,000 and 35,000 and percentages of C/I tax capacity and TIF - <br />captured tax capacity. Among cities with percentages of C/I tax capacity above 35%, the median <br />TIF- captured tax capacity is approximately 9 %. City Administrator Klaers checked the list and <br />verified that Roseville was missing from the list and should be added. <br />Chair von Holtum asked for Councilmember Holden's view on setting the TIF- captured tax <br />capacity benchmark, to which she replied that the EDC should consider the reasons we give TIF, <br />not the amount we give. For example, TIF could be used to encourage development in the B -2 <br />district. The City does not need to use TIF for business attraction, since the City already has low <br />vacancy rates and significant commercial development. Also, although the City seldom uses <br />TIF, that has not hindered commercial development. Commissioner Huninghake agreed with <br />Councilmember Holden that we should not give businesses a tax advantage. In response to a <br />question on the significance of the City having 50% of its tax capacity generated by C/I <br />development, Community Development Director Hutmacher explained that Arden Hills not only <br />has significant commercial development, but the City also has large areas of tax - exempt land <br />such as lakes, colleges, parks, and TCAAP as well as very low - density residential <br />neighborhoods. The City's proportion of commercial tax base is high in comparison to its <br />relatively low residential tax base. <br />Councilmember Holden suggested that the TIF- captured tax capacity benchmark may provide a <br />reason for approving or denying TIF. TIF may not make or break a project, but the City can help <br />make it more affordable and attractive to develop in Arden Hills. Presbyterian Homes received <br />about $1.1 million in TIF but the City is getting a lot back in return, such as sewer repairs and the <br />triangle parcel. <br />