Laserfiche WebLink
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION — SEPTEMBER 19, 2011 8 <br />Municipal Consent process, the City has 90 days from the public hearing to take action to <br />approve, deny, or disapprove with conditions. The last City Council meeting within this 90 day <br />window will be the September 26th regular meeting. If the Council takes no action, Municipal <br />Consent is considered granted. <br />Public Works Director Maurer further stated that the Council discussed the Municipal Consent <br />action at the August 15th Work Session but gave no direction at that time. Ramsey County <br />representatives attending that Work Session indicated they would take a closer look at traffic <br />counts relative to movement loss in both the I -694 project and the proposed US 10 /Highway 96 <br />project. Ramsey County representatives are present to discuss that analysis and a report on their <br />findings. <br />Public Works Director Maurer explained that if the Council is considering a resolution <br />disapproving the final layout with conditions required for approval, there seems to be three main <br />issues: <br />1. The northbound US 10 access to eastbound Highway 96. <br />2. The neighborhood requested a noise wall for the southwest quadrant of the intersection. <br />Mr. Dave Cmiel has suggested that the noise analysis could be looked at in a different <br />manner which will make it entirely fundable by the project. Ramsey County has reviewed <br />Mr. Cmiel's analysis and has determined that the noise wall is still not entirely fundable. <br />3. Timing of the projects is important as Mn/DOT has suggested the US 10 /Highway 96 <br />project could be constructed in 2012 along with the I -694 improvements. If this were to <br />occur, the Hamline /Snelling crossing of I -694 would be closed at the same time that <br />Highway 96 is closed due to the lowering of the roadway 22 feet. This would force all <br />trips from north to south Arden Hills, including Public Works and Sheriff traffic, to use <br />Lexington Avenue which will also have bridge widening work happening in 2012. <br />Councilmember Holden asked if Municipal Consent can be postponed. <br />Public Works Director Maurer stated that he thinks Municipal Consent should happen now and <br />if the Council has concerns, address those concerns by attaching conditions. <br />Mayor Grant stated that he would like to discuss the sound wall on the west side of US 10. He <br />has read through the report and his interpretation is that a sound wall would be justified. <br />Jim Tolaas, Ramsey County Public Works, stated that the process does require Municipal <br />Consent within a specific period of time. He added that the County • shares the City's concerns <br />regarding the staging of these projects. He further explained that the state has everybody's interest <br />at heart and their thought was to complete both bridges within one season to minimize the amount <br />of down time on Highway 96 and shorten the amount of time the east /west connection was <br />disrupted. He added that if they began the Lexington Avenue project later, it would then impact <br />two construction seasons, but going into two construction seasons considering the I -694 project <br />might be better anyway. He suggested the Council add a condition that the state work diligently <br />toward coming up with a plan that would look comprehensively at the work on I -694 and <br />Highway 96 and make sure that all the movements and the timing are appropriate. <br />