My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2E, Lexington Avenue Bridge Widening
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
01-17-12-WS
>
2E, Lexington Avenue Bridge Widening
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2024 12:08:05 AM
Creation date
1/13/2012 9:10:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
January 17 2012 City Council Work Sessio
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EN HILLS <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> DATE: January 17, 2012 <br /> TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers <br /> Patrick Klaers, City Administrator <br /> FROM: Terry Maurer, Public Works Director <br /> SUBJECT: Lexington Avenue Bridge Widening <br /> Background <br /> As part of the negotiated settlement with Mn/DOT for Municipal Consent on the I-694 <br /> project, Mn/DOT agreed to widen the Lexington Avenue Bridge to provide an ADA <br /> compliant pedestrian crossing. The agreement stated that Mn/DOT, Arden Hills and <br /> Shoreview would meet to discuss and decide the appropriate side (east or west) for the <br /> widening and pedestrian crossing. <br /> The first meeting was held at Shoreview City Hall on May 23, 2011, and was attended by <br /> Mark.Lindeberg from Mn/DOT, Mark Maloney from Shoreview and myself. There was <br /> general discussion at this meeting relating to a number of issues such as: <br /> • Widening to the east is more economical than the west due to the fact that it can <br /> be accomplished with one additional standard bridge beam. Widening to the west <br /> would require two special beams (widening to the west would require greater <br /> width because the east already has a narrow space available for pedestrians) to <br /> maintain proper clearance from the beam bottom to the interstate road surface <br /> below due to the grade of the interstate. <br /> • The Shoreview side has pedestrian facilities currently in place from County Road <br /> D to County Road J. <br /> • The Arden Hills side does not have pedestrian facilities in place from County <br /> Road F to Grey Fox Road. (It was indicated that the Arden Hills City Council <br /> would be willing to discuss construction of this infrastructure if the bridge was <br /> widened to the west) <br /> • Shoreview agreed to fund the realignment of the existing trails from the north and <br /> south ramps to the widened bridge if the widening was on the east side. <br /> i <br /> City Council Meeting <br /> C:\Users\sonj a.klingberg\Desktop\1-17-12LexingtonBridge Widening.doc <br /> Page 1 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.