Laserfiche WebLink
PARKS, TRAILS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE MEETING <br />November 20, 2007 Page 2 <br />5. BUCKTHORN CRITERIA DISCUSSION <br />Discussion ensued on how to eradicate the buckthorn and possibly applying a herbicide or using Garlon 4 which <br />can be painted on the buckthorn. <br /> <br />Chair Henry asked Ms. O’Brien and Ms. Chayka for suggestions on what the PTRC do in terms of eradicating <br />buckthorn from the park and where they should focus their efforts. <br /> <br />Ms. O’Brien suggested first getting rid of the females with the berries by cutting them when the sap is falling. <br />She stated they may have to be cut twice to stop the berries. She stated they could look into addressing <br />buckthorn removal on a large scale and get back with the information. <br /> <br />Chair Henry asked if possibly residents along the park could learn enough about how to do this and could work <br />on it in an afternoon? <br /> <br />Ms. Chayka stated if the residents along the park are interested in doing this they would encourage that. <br /> <br />Committee Member Baumann agreed that they needed to get the community involved and get sponsors for each <br />park. <br /> <br />Ms. O’Brien also mentioned that residents need to remove it from their own yards and needed to get further <br />education on buckthorn. <br /> <br />Ms. Olson said there is an ordinance to remove buckthorn but this is very difficult to enforce. <br /> <br />Ms. O’Brien mentioned that Janet Larson talks about taking a micro-managed approach to the removal where <br />one person cuts, one person pulls and one paints. She also gave a handout from the City of Minnetonka on the <br />Natural Resource Stewards Program. <br /> <br />6. TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE DISCUSSION – Meagan Beekman <br />Ms. Beekman indicated the City Council had directed staff to look into drafting a Tree Preservation Ordinance <br />and goals have been discussed on what the ordinance should accomplish. She did some research and found that <br />some ordinances are very simple and others more complex whereby they state what trees can be cut, what ones <br />have to be replaced, how large, what species, and so forth. The next step is to draft an actual ordinance and then <br />have another work session where they present that drafted ordinance and move forward from there. She <br />indicated the first yellow packet shows what the city of Arden Hills currently has on requirements for the tree <br />preservation and she also provided a copy of the tree preservation ordinance that the City of Minnetonka is <br /> <br />working on. <br /> <br />Chair Henry asked if they could specify species that they would like to get rid of. <br /> <br />Ms. Beekman confirmed they could specify that. She also indicated that in the current ordinance it states <br />residents should be removing their buckthorn and feels that is something that needs to be strengthened and <br />reworked to make it more enforceable. <br /> <br />Discussion continued on who determines what an invasive species is. <br /> <br />Chair Henry indicated that the ordinance should not just be a tree preservation ordinance but a tree ordinance <br />stating both what the City wants to encourage and discourage. <br /> <br />Ms. Beekman agreed that was true to a certain extent. She indicated there are two ordinances that encompass <br />trees - the landscaping ordinance and tree preservation ordinance. She stated they work very closely together <br />and the way the tree preservation ordinance is enforced is through the landscaping requirements. She stated a <br />developer is required to plant certain types and amounts of trees and shrubbery. She indicated this was only for <br />new projects and would encompass all new developments that require a building permit. She stated in any <br /> <br />