Laserfiche WebLink
A Guide To Developing A Community Tree Preservation Ordinance Page 6 of 8 <br /> replacement trees,this approach fails to mitigate the environmental effect of mature tree loss <br /> A variety of replacement strategies are possible including: 1 <br /> ■ requiring developers to set aside wooded areas as preserves; <br /> ■ sliding scales; <br /> ■ percentage replacement; <br /> ■ off-site reforestation; <br /> ■ flexible no-net loss formulas. <br /> Each approach has its advantages and disadvantages-none is perfect.When replacement of <br /> trees is included in an ordinance,the questions,"why,how much,and where?"need to be <br /> primary considerations.The intent of a tree preservation ordinance should be to provide <br /> incentives for unique and creative project designs that complement the woodlands ani <br /> replace excessive tree loss. <br /> Implementation <br /> The uniform and unbiased implementation of any ordinance can fail if some precautions are <br /> not observed.Those who are charged with implementation must be able to do so without bia: <br /> or prejudice(avoiding politics).The ordinance should be easy to read and understand for <br /> everyone, including the developer,the staff,the elected officials, and the citizens of the <br /> community,or frustration and mistrust may develop. <br /> Incentives <br /> Developing an ordinance which creates incentives is a positive way to achieve compliance. <br /> Examples include the preserved trees being credited to the landscaping typically required on <br /> a project.Also,a protected woodlot may be dedicated to the community in lieu of park <br /> dedication requirements. <br /> Enforcement <br /> Most ordinances contain provisions for enforcement and penalties for violations should they <br /> occur during the construction process.Enforcement usually involves an inspection process, <br /> and,when violations occur,the developer may be held accountable by one of several <br /> methods: <br /> ■ withholding of occupancy permits until the problem is <br /> corrected; <br /> ■ loss of money in the form of a bond that was posted prior to <br /> the start of construction; <br /> ■ fines; <br /> ■ stoppage of the project if violations are extreme. <br /> Some developers have been taken to court,losing their case and required to reimburse <br /> thousands of dollars related to the tree loss.Some ordinances require the violator to make <br /> reparations to the community by donating trees to be planted on public property. <br /> In some instances, an ordinance will cover the loss of trees through bonding for several year: <br /> to protect against tree loss due to construction injury.These ordinances usually have a <br /> decreasing bond clause which reduces the amount of money each year upon determination <br /> http://www.mnstac.org/RFC/preservationordguide.htm 11/14/2007 <br />