My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-20-07 PTRC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC)
>
PTRC Minutes/Packets/(1968 to 2009)
>
1999-2009
>
2007
>
11-20-07 PTRC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/9/2024 12:16:46 AM
Creation date
2/22/2012 2:31:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
11-20-07 PTRC Packet
General - Type
11-20-07 PTRC Packet
Category
11-20-07 PTRC Packet
Date
11/20/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
priorities and goals of the city should be regarding tree preservation. At this meeting Council <br /> Members and Commissioners provided comments and direction to staff on this issue. <br /> Staff is now in the process of gathering additional information and beginning to draft optional <br /> code language for further review. Staff is consulting with the Parks, Trails, and Recreation <br /> Committee in order to provide an update on the process and to gather additional input. Due to <br /> the complexity of preparing tree preservation regulations, this process will likely be ongoing and <br /> will require additional meetings. <br /> Tree Preservation <br /> The potential impact of a tree preservation ordinance is great. It can be written to regulate only <br /> the most extreme and largest redevelopments,but it also has the potential to shape every <br /> redevelopment within the city. The benefits of a well written tree preservation ordinance can <br /> also be great. It has the potential to preserve open space,protect woodland areas, encourage <br /> responsible land redevelopment, and protect the beauty of the natural landscape of a community. <br /> However, a poorly written or misguided tree preservation ordinance can be cumbersome, <br /> difficult to enforce, and unintentionally overwhelming for even small projects. If not crafted to <br /> meet the goals of the City, the tree preservation could increase the complexity of many projects <br /> without producing a clear and beneficial outcome. The ordinance can also add cost to projects <br /> for the City review and for property owners. <br /> The following discussion addresses both the economic and physical constraints of construction <br /> on wooded lots as well as the benefits of established trees in our community. <br /> Goals <br /> Determining the goals and scope is an important part of developing this ordinance. It will flavor <br /> the outcome of the regulations. For example, if the goal is tree preservation over tree <br /> replacement, then an outcome might be a regulation that requires new development to impact as <br /> few trees as possible during planning and construction. However, this regulation can affect the <br /> location, size, scope, and economics of a project. The city might put in place incentives to <br /> encourage tree preservation and help with the cost of development, such as height bonuses and <br /> setback reductions for significant trees saved,or reduced landscaping requirements in return for <br /> preserved trees. <br /> The goals discussed at the October 22, 2007 Joint Work Session are as follows: <br /> • Preserve existing significant trees during development <br /> • Reduce significant tree loss during development <br /> • Preserve significant trees during construction <br /> City of Arden Hills <br /> PTRC Meeting for November 20, 2007 <br /> lWhdocs]lARWHdataWlanninglPlanning CasesC00710X--OXX Tree Presenation OrdinanceU12007-PTRC Report-Ti ee Presen ation.doc <br /> Page 2 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.