My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-18-07 PTRC
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Parks, Trails and Recreation Committee (PTRC)
>
PTRC Minutes/Packets/(1968 to 2009)
>
1999-2009
>
2007
>
09-18-07 PTRC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/6/2024 12:19:18 AM
Creation date
2/22/2012 2:37:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Document
9-18-07 PTRC Packet
General - Type
9-18-07 PTRC Packet
Category
9-18-07 PTRC Packet
Date
9/18/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii. More friendly to pedestrians (3) <br /> iv. Walking paths on both sides, more accessible for the ageing. <br /> v. Walking across Snelling. <br /> vi. Bike Trail along Lexington. <br /> f. Environment <br /> i. Keep the green trees that are there. It's green! — No more parking <br /> spaces. <br /> ii. Increase tree percentage. <br /> iii. Higher curb appeal. <br /> iv. Parking areas have trees & greenery in them <br /> v. No main street. <br /> vi. Small town feeling— main street area. <br /> vii. Save some green space. <br /> viii. Higher environmental ethics. <br /> g. Other <br /> i. Lexington R.R. crossing—what about a post office there. <br /> ii. Covert Holiday Inn to senior housing. <br /> iii. Fall Community Event. <br /> iv. High power circuit boxes. <br /> v. Develop property on both north and south of Co Rd E & Lex. <br /> 7. What are you biggest concerns about the future of Arden Hills? <br /> a. TCAAP <br /> i. TCAAP—too high density— need low density and variety of <br /> housing (3) <br /> ii. TCAAP pollution (2) <br /> iii. Too much money spent on TCAAP (2) <br /> iv. Keep a large portion of TCAAP natural (2) <br /> v. What will happen to TCAAP? <br /> vi. Concern that the future of TCAAP will not utilize all the planning & <br /> vision expanded on it thus far. <br /> vii. TCAAP developed new real downtown of Arden Hills. <br /> viii. Link TCAAP with the rest of Arden Hills. <br /> ix. TCAAP development plan is too complicated to figure out & makes <br /> access to Arden Manor more difficult for emergency vehicles. <br /> x. Stores in TCAAP have "small town ambiance" <br /> A. On TCAAP have a community gathering space. <br /> b. Transportation/Traffic <br /> i. Traffic Problems/Congestion (8) <br /> ii. Hwy 10 & 96 concept plan isn't a good plan (2) <br /> iii. Overcrowding on side streets. <br /> iv. 96/10/35 Highway issues. <br /> v. 35 W/Hwy10/694 traffic, why do we have to be responsible. <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.