03-19-12-WS - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—MARCH 19, 2012 7 Councilmember Werner commented this same concern was brought up by the EDC. One issue that still hasn't been addressed is how the residents of Arden Hills will react to the Salvation Army proposal. Councilmember Holmes noted the rezoning could be done in such a way to allow for an interim use permit for the Salvation Army. Another option would be to create a PUD with the rezoning. Each would require a 4/5 vote. Mayor Grant stated he did not see how the Council could put a residential use in the Industrial zone. He indicated the transportation issues for the City would also be a concern. He understood the improvements proposed for the property would benefit the City, but felt the use did not fit the site. He commented the Financial Planning and Analysis Committee was not in favor of additional tax free property in the City. The burden created would affect Arden Hills residents. Overall,he felt the proposed use was wrong for the site. Mr. Anderson explained the City's portion of tax loss would be $10,000 per year. He questioned if the Salvation Army were to bring more than $10,000 into the City if this would assist with the decision. Mayor Grant appreciated the recycling aspect. However, the use still did not fit into the Industrial site. Councilmember Holmes reviewed the surrounding uses at this location. She did not feel the rehabilitation center would interfere and fully supported the Salvation Army coming to Arden Hills. Mayor Grant indicated the Salvation Army does provide a great service through the program at the rehabilitation center and should be respected. Councilmember Werner agreed stating he appreciated the tour and the work completed by the Salvation Army. However, at this time, he could not support the rezoning. Councilmember Tamble stated the majority of the Council did not support the rezoning. However, he would support the issue if financial issues were further discussed. Mr. Price understood the Council's concerns. He indicated there were 120 rehabilitation centers throughout the United States and nearly all were located in light industrial or mixed use zoning districts. The reason for this was to avoid putting a warehouse in a residential zoning district. Councilmember Holmes felt this was a good point. She recommended the Council consider this redevelopment as it was a unique facility with residential and light industrial. Mayor Grant questioned how the current Minneapolis site was zoned. Mr. Price stated the site was zoned industrial (I-2) with a residential overlay that allows for housing. He commented the downtown warehouse district has transformed over time with more and more housing.