Laserfiche WebLink
driveway and 20%of the traffic would use the westerly driveway. For the banquet and restaurant reuses, <br /> it was assumed that 80% would use the western driveway and 20% would be split from the easterly <br /> driveways. <br /> By applying the site trip distribution to the Existing P.M.Peak Hour traffic,as found in the Spack report, <br /> RLK was able to model the Build condition in the P.M. Peak Hour scenario. Levels of service were no <br /> worse than LOS-C for any of the study intersections. <br /> Delay and stacking distance did not appear to be significant at any of the driveways during the PM Peak <br /> Hour. SimTraffic analyses showed a 95`s Percentile Queue length of 51 feet(approx.2 car lengths)at the <br /> easterly driveway, and the model showed the queue cleared rapidly as traffic entered County Road E. <br /> The westerly driveway and the right-in/right-out driveway onto Lexington had similarly minimal queue <br /> lengths. <br /> Parldng <br /> Lot 1 is projected to provide 259 parking stalls, while Lot 2 is projected to provide 80 parking stalls. <br /> Thus the total projected parking to be provided is 339 stalls. <br /> Using rates from ITE Parking Generation,3rd Edition,the 150 unit apartment building would require 180 <br /> stalls. The projected parking demand for a day-care would be 17 stalls, while the projected parking <br /> demand for a health/fitness club would be 40 stalls. The projected parking demand for a pharmacy would <br /> be 34 stalls. Therefore, the projected parking demand of the proposed apartment building and the <br /> possible ancillary uses would be 271 stalls. This layout meets the projected parking demand. <br /> Conclusion <br /> RLK has tested several scenarios of trip generation and traffic operation for the market-rate apartment <br /> site, westerly portion of the building and the conceptual parcel to the east. Because of the effects of <br /> transit and other modes (i.e.,bikes,etc.), as well as shared trips and internal capture,it is our conclusion <br /> that the trip generation and traffic operation associated with these potential uses will operate the same,if <br /> not better than the previous use on the site (Holiday Inn hotel). The access locations do not negatively <br /> impact the flow of traffic along County Road E, nor do the various proposed trip generators cause <br /> increased impacts to the overall street network. The addition of the right-intright-out driveway onto <br /> Lexington will provide access options to the driver. <br /> It is important to realize that this analysis encompasses the market-rate apartments, and also makes <br /> assumptions as to the potential uses for Lot 2 and the reuse of the former restaurant and banquet facilities. <br /> More accurate trip generation calculations can be made for the site once those uses have been determined. <br /> GADavidson Companies\2011-052-M\—Correspondence\Traffic Impact Study 03132012.doc <br /> RLK Incorporated Page 8 of 8 February 13,2012 <br /> Co.Rd.E&Lexington Traffic Study 2011-052-M <br />