My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2B, 2013 PMP
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
07-09-12-WS
>
2B, 2013 PMP
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/23/2024 12:18:46 AM
Creation date
7/3/2012 3:30:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
lt <br /> EN HILLS <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> DATE: July 9,2012 <br /> TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers <br /> Patrick Klaers, City Administrator <br /> FROM: Terry Maurer, Public Works Director 4�1 <br /> SUBJECT: PMP Items <br /> Background <br /> Staff is preparing to bring an item to an upcoming regular Council meeting requesting <br /> authorization to prepare the Feasibility Study for the 2013 PMP. The area under <br /> consideration for the 2013 PMP is the neighborhood south of Lake Johanna and west of <br /> TH 51 comprised of the streets of Edgewater Avenue, Glenhill Road, Ridgewood Road <br /> and Asbury Avenue. However,prior to asking Council to authorize the preparation of the <br /> Feasibility Study, staff wants to pose a few questions to the Council that have been <br /> discussed very briefly in the last few months. These are as follows: <br /> 1. Should reconstructed neighborhood streets always include concrete curb and <br /> gutter when none is currently there or is a reconstruction of the existing <br /> bituminous street surface acceptable? Note: A reconstruction project <br /> without adding concrete curb and gutter will generally be much less costly due <br /> to the depth of excavation (14 inches) needed and the cost of the curb and <br /> gutter. <br /> 2. If reconstruction projects may proceed without adding concrete curb and <br /> gutter should it be up to the property owners to voice an opinion whether or not <br /> their neighborhood streets are reconstructed with or without concrete curb and <br /> gutter? <br /> 3. The City's current assessment policy will likely result in reasonable assessment <br /> rates if concrete curb and gutter is not added to reconstruction projects, but <br /> may result in unsustainable rates for projects where curb and gutter are added. <br /> Does the Council feel that the assessment policy should be reviewed given the <br /> size of the assessment rates on the last full reconstruction project in 2010? <br /> City Council Meeting <br /> P:\Admin\Council\Agendas&Packet Information\2012\07-09-12 Reg Mtg\Packet\7-9-12PMPWorkSession.doc <br /> Page 1 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.