My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5F, Motion to Approve 2nd Quarter of 2012 Financial Reports
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
07-30-12-R
>
5F, Motion to Approve 2nd Quarter of 2012 Financial Reports
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2024 11:24:41 AM
Creation date
7/30/2012 9:27:01 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />�fi` I��ENr�HILL5 <br />MEMORANDUM <br />DATE: July 30, 2012 <br />TO: <br />FROM: <br />SUBJECT: <br />Honorable Mayor and City Council <br />Patrick Klaers, City Administrator <br />Sue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative Services <br />2012 2°d Quarter Actuals <br />� <br />,Y <br />Background/Discussion: <br />Attached are the 2°d Quarter Actuals for 2012. Overall expenditures are running slightly below budget <br />estimates. Revenue estimates are running above budget estimates as a result of increased building permit <br />activity, some additional conduit debt received from Presbyterian Homes, and increased participation in <br />recreation programs. Please remember that we receive 50% of our revenue from property taxes and did <br />not received the lst half until July. Governmental accounting is not done on an accrual basis, therefore the <br />numbers reflect what was actually taken in as revenue or paid out as expenditures thru June 30, 2012. <br />Accruals, deferred revenue adjustments, etc. are only done at year-end. Basically expenditures from <br />operating activities are running close to the budget estimates or slightly below, revenues are slightly <br />above budget estimates. (Please note that the overall percentages look lower because property taxes, <br />liquor licenses, etc are collected at year-end.) <br />New this year are the internal service funds. These funds are charged back to the operating departments. <br />We have included estimated charges through June 30�` in these reports. These costs may seem to appear <br />double counted when you look at the organization in total, as they appear in the internal service funds and <br />then again as charges in the departments which used them — governmental accounting determines how we <br />show this in our fund financial statements, but adjustments are made at audit time to show only the actual <br />expenditures as any surplus or deficits in the internal service funds are rolled into the government-wide <br />statements so actual expenditures and revenues are shown. They are meant to operate like the enterprise <br />funds (our utility funds) but service our "internal" customers, which are our departments. They make it <br />easier to manage budgets as we can see the "total" spent or received for these activities like Public Works, <br />Insurance, Engineering, and Technology. <br />An Investment Portfolio has also been included with these financial reports. Per the Investment Policy, <br />our Benchmark Rate is the 4M plus Rate. At June 30, 2012 — this rate was 0.05% and our portfolio is <br />averaging 1.974%. All of our investments are in government secured or government backed deposits. <br />The section listed at the top of the portfolio are the "liquid" investments that we can access at anytime. <br />(The large amount in the Evergreen US Govt Money Market Fund is a reflection of securities what were <br />called in late June and have been reinvested, but settlement dates were not until July.) We are trying to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.