My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8A, Presentation and Approval of the 2011 Performance Measurement Report
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
06-25-12-R
>
8A, Presentation and Approval of the 2011 Performance Measurement Report
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2024 11:23:35 AM
Creation date
8/15/2012 1:46:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� <br />EN HILLS <br />MEMORANDUM <br />DATE: June 27, 2011 <br />TO: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers <br />Patrick Klaers, City Administrator <br />FROM: Kyle Howard, Finance Analyst <br />Sue Iverson, Director of Finance and Administrative Services <br />SUBJECT: Report on 2011 Performance Measures as Recommended by the Council <br />on Local Results and Innovation . <br />Background <br />The Council on Local Results and Innovation was created by the 2010 Legislature to set <br />benchmarks for city and county operations. Through several meetings, the group adopted <br />standards which are relatively easy to measure using survey tools. The legislation comes <br />with two incentives to participate. There is a standing appropriation available for <br />participants equal to 14 cents per capita (this equates to $1,337 a year for the City of <br />Arden Hills). The other incentive is that participating entities are exempt from levy <br />limits when they are in effect. (We did receive $1,337 in January of this year for the <br />program.) <br />The performance measures are mostly community survey questions and the OSA is not <br />going to dictate how you get the results. This means that we could do something like <br />using Survey Monkey on our website and advertising it in our newsletter. It does not <br />need to be a statistically valid survey like Decision Resources to qualify. We already use <br />Survey Monkey which costs $199 a year vs. paying for a Community Survey from <br />Decision Resources which runs $10,000 plus. <br />Results of the Survev for 2011 <br />The City did put together a survey in the form prescribed by the Office of the State <br />Auditor (OSA) and Council on local Results and Innovation and placed it on the City's <br />website. It was published in our City newsletter, announced at our May 29, 2012 <br />meeting, and on our local access channel. <br />Attached are the survey and the results of the survey the City received. The OSA <br />requires that results of the survey need to be publicized and shared with the community. <br />City Council Meeting <br />P:�Admin\Council�Agendas & Packet Information�2012\06-25-12 Reg Mtg�Packet�2011 Performance Measures Report.doc <br />Page 1 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.