My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2C, Zoning Study Discussion - Multi-Family Design Standards
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
08-20-12-WS
>
2C, Zoning Study Discussion - Multi-Family Design Standards
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2012 9:25:40 AM
Creation date
8/17/2012 9:25:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Staff has sent out copies of the draft regulations to identified stakeholders, seeking comments. <br /> Discussion <br /> Based on the Planning Commission's discussions, Staff has prepared a draft ordinance that <br /> addresses multi-family design standards. The regulations include items related to the following: <br /> • Added definition for Enclosed parking <br /> • Minimum units sizes <br /> • Submission of a security plan and lighting plan. <br /> • Parking requirements <br /> • A requirement that adequate common areas be provided <br /> • Percentage of efficiency apartments allowed within a specific development <br /> • Minimum bike parking requirements <br /> • Window covering requirements <br /> Staff sent a copy of the draft regulations to the City's Attorney, as well as the League of <br /> Minnesota Cities to get feedback. Comments from the league indicated that the City should <br /> avoid regulations within the Zoning Code that directly pertain to items regulated by the State <br /> Building Code. State Law preempts the State Building Code from other, more restrictive, <br /> requirements that a city may wish to impose. <br /> Further, the attorney recommended making all multi-family housing a conditional use, and <br /> making the standards indicated in the draft regulations, additional criteria for conditional use <br /> permit approval. This procedural recommendation differs from the City's current process, which <br /> has multi-family housing be a conditional permitted use through a PUD. <br /> Finally, the attorney recommended addressing participation in the Crime Free Multi Housing <br /> program, through the Ramsey County Sheriffs Department, in the rental registration program. <br /> Staff has not yet had an opportunity to fully analyze the implications of such a change; however, <br /> additional discussion on this topic with the Council would be helpful in providing direction. <br /> Through their discussion, the Planning Commission is recommending that the additional <br /> requirements apply to all new multi-family housing consistently, and that separate regulations for <br /> independent senior units or renovations of existing buildings not have separate or special <br /> provisions. The Planning Commission acknowledged that each property is reviewed on a case <br /> by case basis, and that the variance and PUD processes exist to deal with unique properties or <br /> properties with special circumstances. <br /> City of Arden Hills <br /> City Council Work Session for August 20, 2012 <br /> P:Tlanning0anning Cases120121Zoning Code Amendment-Multi family HousingW8-20-12- CC Memo-Multi family zoning study.doc <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.