My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-24-12-WS
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
09-24-12-WS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/31/2012 7:59:46 AM
Creation date
9/21/2012 3:34:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION— SEPTEMBER 24, 2012 3 <br /> Mayor Grant stated that at $1.88 per month per household, he felt that Eureka Recycling's fees <br /> were reasonable. <br /> Councilmember Tamble noted that he has no complaints about Eureka Recycling. The proof is <br /> in the average revenue share per month as to how much we are recycling in the City. If we <br /> maintain the same path, we will likely see $20,000 in revenue for the City, and he likes the idea <br /> of the dividend. He does not see a point in seeking out RFP's. <br /> Councilmember Werner noted that his experience with Eureka Recycling has not been positive. <br /> He used to put out aluminum cans in plastic bags, and Eureka would not take it because of the <br /> plastic bag. Also, for years, he would put his recycling in a regular garbage can until he received <br /> a note stating that the container was too large. <br /> Mayor Grant stated that Eureka Recycling recycles 100% of what he puts out and he likes that. <br /> He said that something to note with single sort is that a bin that is roughly the size of a regular <br /> garbage container is used for recycling materials. He said that complaints are already received <br /> from residents regarding neighbors that do not screen in their garbage cans. If we give residents <br /> another large can it will exacerbate the problem. Also, if the recycler doesn't like the mixture of <br /> recyclables, they will take the load to the dump. The cottage cheese containers that people get <br /> upset about Eureka Recycling not accepting is far less waste in the landfill than a whole garbage <br /> truck of recyclables that are rejected and placed in the dump. For these reasons, added to the fact <br /> that Eureka Recycling is lower in price than the other haulers, makes him lean toward keeping <br /> Eureka Recycling. <br /> Councilmember Holden noted that if we negotiate a contract with Eureka Recycling, maybe we <br /> can add more educational stuff within the contract. <br /> Councilmember Holmes questioned if Eureka Recycling is the lowest priced. <br /> City Planner Beekman explained that Foth Infrastructure & Environment, LLC completed an <br /> analysis of recycling haulers. She cautioned that it is difficult to compare contract-to-contract <br /> simply by looking at cost per household because some contain processing fees, some have <br /> revenue shares, and some have fuel surcharges that are not included in the per monthly household <br /> cost and are billed separately. We are on the low end price-wise compared to other cities, and <br /> that speaks highly of our contract with Eureka Recycling because of the relative small size of the <br /> community. She stated that increasing education is a priority of hers, which also includes <br /> offering more information about revenue sharing. She is interested in the Council's feelings <br /> regarding broadening the program to include multi-family properties. <br /> Mayor Grant stated that he is in favor of more people recycling because it is more <br /> environmentally conscientious. <br /> Councilmember Holden stated that she thought that some multi-family properties already had <br /> their own recycling haulers, so she would be concerned about"stepping on toes". <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.