My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-27-12-R
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
08-27-12-R
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/26/2012 8:38:33 AM
Creation date
9/26/2012 8:38:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL—AUGUST 27, 2012 4 <br /> Mayor Grant opened the public hearing at 7:15 p.m. <br /> There being no comments from the public, Mayor Grant closed the public hearing at 7:16 p.m. <br /> MOTION: Councilmember Tamble moved and Mayor Grant seconded a motion for the <br /> adoption of Resolution 2012-029: Adoptinsz and Confirming Quarter 2 <br /> Special Assessments for Delinquent Utilities. The motion carried <br /> unanimously (4-0). <br /> 8. NEW BUSINESS <br /> A. Planning Case#12-013 —Variance at 1185 Benton Way <br /> Community Development Intern Horton stated that an application was received from Ed and <br /> Karen Bacig at 1185 Benton Way in the Hunter's Park Development for a variance to allow a 574 <br /> square foot addition between their home and garage. The proposed plan includes a breezeway <br /> connecting the existing garage as well as a built area over the existing deck. He noted that this <br /> proposal is significantly similar to a previous variance request that was made by the property <br /> owners, and approved by the City Council in 2007, but was never built. At the time, a one-year <br /> extension was given and that extension has since expired. <br /> Community Development Intern Horton indicated that three variances are needed to complete <br /> this project. The zoning requirements include: 1) a side-yard setback minimum of five feet with <br /> a combined minimum of 15 feet on both sides is required, but the proposed plan results in <br /> combined setback of 10 feet; 2) the structural lot coverage is required by Code to not exceed 25 <br /> percent; however, the proposed addition would result in 27 percent lot coverage by structure; and <br /> 3) the landscaped lot area is required to be a minimum of 65 percent, and the proposed addition <br /> would only leave a landscaped lot area of 61 percent. <br /> Community Development Intern Horton noted that a new law passed legislation in 2011 that <br /> changed the review criteria cities must use when evaluating variance requests. He also noted that <br /> the Planning Commission unanimously passed this request when it was presented at their August <br /> 8, 2012, meeting. <br /> Councilmember Tamble inquired what constitutes the side yard setback because it looks like it <br /> was a front-rear issue. <br /> Community Development Intern Horton stated that the front yard is where the driveway comes <br /> in and the side yard is the north and south sides of the property. <br /> Mayor Grant inquired about the review criteria that was outlined and how it has changed from <br /> previous criteria. <br /> Community Development Intern Horton explained that the criteria have not changed, but rather <br /> the language changed from the term `undue hardship' to `practical difficulties'. <br /> Councilmember Holden inquired how the list of four conditions was established. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.