My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8B, Planning Case 12-006 – Bethel CUP Amendment & Variance
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
05-29-12-R
>
8B, Planning Case 12-006 – Bethel CUP Amendment & Variance
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/24/2024 11:21:39 AM
Creation date
9/28/2012 9:48:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�.� <br />14. The proposed plan does not conflict with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning <br />Code or the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City. <br />I�ariance Evaluation Findings: <br />15. The variance would be in harmony with the purpose and intent of the City's <br />ordinances and Comprehensive Plan. <br />16. The variance request would put the property to use in a reasonable manner because a <br />university campus is a permitted use in the B-1 District, and a wellness center is a <br />reasonable ancillary use to that. <br />17. The property is unique in the City because of its size and configuration, which allows <br />multiple large buildings that are not visible from adjacent property. <br />18. The proposal will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood because it is <br />not anticipated to be visible from adjacent property. <br />City Planner Meagan Beekman stated notice was published in the Arden Hills/Shoreview <br />Bulletin and notice was prepared by the City and mailed to residents within one thousand <br />five hundred (1500) feet of the subject property. The City received one email from a <br />resident concerned with storage of materials during the construction phase. <br />Commissioner Zimmerman asked if when the Robertson Center was constructed was a <br />variance granted for the height. City Planner Meagan Beekman stated the height <br />requirements were most likely different at the time of the construction. <br />Commissioner Holewa asked if the temporary structures need to be approved by the <br />Planning Commission as well as the City Council. City Planner Meagan Beekman stated <br />it only needs City Council approval. The extension of the temporary structures is decided <br />by the Council. <br />Commissioner Stodola questioned the aerial views and the location of the temporary <br />classrooms. City Planner Meagan Beekman showed the current location of the temporary <br />classrooms at this time and indicated where they would be relocated. <br />Staff recommends approval of Planning Case 12-006, for a Conditional Use Permit, <br />Variance and extension of temporary classrooms at 3900 Bethel Drive subject to the <br />following seven conditions: <br />1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by <br />the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by <br />the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission and <br />City Council. <br />2. The applicant shall continue to abide by all previous agreements and Conditional Use <br />Permits, as amended by the conditions of approval of this application. <br />3. A Conditional Use Permit drafted by the City Attorney shall be signed by the <br />applicant prior to the issuance of any building permits. <br />4. A building permit shall be obtained for all proposed structures. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.