My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2F, Preliminary Budget Discussion
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
05-21-12-WS
>
2F, Preliminary Budget Discussion
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2012 2:18:22 PM
Creation date
9/28/2012 2:18:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo <br /> 2012 Budget Memo <br /> 2 <br /> • Increase in employee benefits costs (health and dental). We do not have preliminary <br /> numbers for these costs yet, but will be getting these in the next few months. Our <br /> insurance pool went out for bids on rates in 2009 for 2010 and we received a I% increase <br /> in 2009, a 13% decrease in 2010, and a 3.6% increase in 2011, which was the lowest they <br /> could give us by law. We did go out for various bids with other firms in 2009 and we did <br /> not experience favorable rates. Staff recommends staying with the current insurance <br /> provider at this time. Until we get the actual numbers, a 15% increase will be used. The <br /> current City contribution towards health and dental is $697.42 per month, but we are <br /> supplementing some of that from the dividends we have been receiving from the Co-op to <br /> keep the cost to the budget even with 2010. Over the past few years, the Council had <br /> approved budgeting for 50% of the increase in premium. In other words, the City equally <br /> shared the rate increase with the employees. Staff would recommend to continue to use <br /> this formula for budget purposes. <br /> • Update the five year CIP. Staff is currently in the process of updating the current plan to <br /> discuss with the City Council at the June work session. Does the City Council have any <br /> feedback or direction they would like to provide staff with respect to the CIP? <br /> • An area where staff sees a need is in park funding. Park dedication fees are generally <br /> limited to capital improvements, not general repair and maintenance items, and there is <br /> not a steady stream of income. In looking at the financial plan, staff sees a need to set up <br /> a reserve for park improvements. This fund would then be a funding source for items <br /> which are included in the CIP. <br /> • As a step in creating a quality budget document, performance measures/service indicators <br /> need to be established for each department. Some of these may come about as a result of <br /> the community survey (if one is done) as areas that the Council would like to improve. <br /> Goals and objectives also need to be established for each department. These would need <br /> to be established in 2013, then in subsequent years actual performance can be tracked to <br /> show progress against these goals. This would provide Council and the public another <br /> tool to evaluate city services. Staff would appreciate input from the Council on this <br /> matter. <br /> Recommended Action: <br /> Staff is seeking direction from the Council as it continues with the 2013 Budgeting process. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.