My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2A, TIF White Paper
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
04-16-12-WS
>
2A, TIF White Paper
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/28/2012 2:22:44 PM
Creation date
9/28/2012 2:22:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
We commend that the following points, taken from our research, be held in mind throughout this <br /> process: <br /> 1. The"but for" tests are only the minimum requirements for qualifying for TIF; prudent <br /> communities set more stringent requirements. <br /> 2. TIF is there to solve community problems. <br /> 3. Use TIF only when truly necessary; it was never designed to be an alternate financing <br /> method for private developers. <br /> TIF Selection Criteria <br /> Below is a draft of what selection criteria might look like. This is for discussion purposes only. <br /> The goal would be to modify the percentages and the specific criteria and have the City Council <br /> eventually, debate, vote and approve the Criteria. Once this is done the Economic Development <br /> Committee (EDC), with any assistance needed from FPAC, should develop a detailed scoring <br /> process and methodology. <br /> Minimum requirements to use TIF <br /> • The long-term viability of the development partner has been reviewed and the City has <br /> determined that the partner has the financial stability and track record to drive the full <br /> benefit of the project over the life of the project <br /> • The objective of the project produces long-term expected benefit that exceeds the length <br /> of the TIF and is at least 15 years in duration. <br /> Selection Criteria (in rank priority order within each section) <br /> Community Goals 60% <br /> 1. Materially enhances the health, safety and well-being of all who live, work and play in <br /> the City. <br /> a. Enhances an interconnected system of trails, pathways and open spaces. <br /> b. Protects and preserves the community's natural resources including open spaces, <br /> lakes, wetlands, other significant natural features and historic resources. <br /> 2. Enhances or retains development of TCAAP in a way that accommodates a mix of land <br /> uses that is sensitive to the natural environment, economically sustainable and a benefit to <br /> the community <br /> 3. Retains or creates jobs that are long-term in nature and at or above the median for the <br /> State of Minnesota(vs. Business Subsidy Policy standard?) <br /> 4. Creates a desirable commercial/retail environment that enhances the long-term vitality of <br /> the City. <br /> 5. Provides a transportation system that has convenient and effective multi-modal <br /> connections within Arden Hills and to adjacent municipalities, the remainder of the Twin <br /> Cities Metropolitan Area and greater Minnesota. <br /> Future Leverage Goals 30% <br /> 1. Likelihood project will spur other projects that will not require further subsidy. <br /> a. Increases the ability to further develop a healthy and accessible community <br /> b. the center for further business development <br /> c. Increases likelihood of job growth in a growing industry <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.