Laserfiche WebLink
Findings of Fact <br /> Staff offers the following nine findings of fact for review: <br /> 1. The height of the fence exceeds the maximum allowable height in the front yard <br /> structural setback. <br /> 2. A three foot fence is allowed in the proposed location without a site plan review process. <br /> 3. The proposed fence will not damage the abutting property. <br /> 4. The finished side of the fence will face the adjoining property. <br /> 5. The proposal does not improve the livability of the property. <br /> 6. The proposal does not improve the appearance of the property, as the proposed fence <br /> location is not consistent with other properties in the area. <br /> 7. The proposal does not improve the security of the property, as a three-foot fence would <br /> effectively provide security for the property. <br /> 8. There is a documented history of conflict between the applicant and the adjoining <br /> property owners. <br /> 9. The proposal will not alleviate the conflict amongst the property owners as there are other <br /> remedies available outside of erecting a 6-foot fence in the front yard. <br /> Staff Analysis <br /> The findings of fact for this Site Plan Review support a recommendation for denial. If the <br /> Planning Commission wishes to make a recommendation for approval,the findings of fact must <br /> be amended to reflect the reasons for the approval. <br /> If the Planning Commission recommends approval of this site plan review, Staff recommends the <br /> following three conditions: <br /> 1. The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by <br /> the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by <br /> the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission. <br /> 2. The height of the fence panels shall not exceed six feet, and shall be placed as close to <br /> grade as is practical. <br /> 3. The fence shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. <br /> Options <br /> The findings in this report support denial of the site plan review. If the Planning Commission <br /> wishes to recommend approval the findings should be amended to reflect the reasons for the <br /> approval. <br /> City of Arden Hills <br /> Planning Commission Meeting for October 3, 2012 <br /> P:IPlanninglPlanning CasesQ012U2-016-1850Indian Wayl10-03-12-PC Report.docx <br /> Page 3 of 5 <br />