Laserfiche WebLink
COUNTY RD E (13-2 DISTRICT) IMPLEMENTATION PLAN <br /> Figure 6. This would be provided in conjunction with a median extension on County <br /> Road E at Connelly Street as depicted. The joint modifications are colored in blue in <br /> the figure. Costs associated with these improvements are included in the overall <br /> project costs(see below). <br /> It may be noted that the operational difficulties at the County Road E and northbound <br /> Hwy 51 ramp/Connelly Street intersection noted previously are influenced by the <br /> current design of the County Road E bridge over Hwy 51/Hamline Avenue,and <br /> therefore beyond the scope of this study to address. MnDOT currently has plans to <br /> replace the bridge with geometric(lane and operational)improvements in 2015. <br /> The costs associated with the Phase I Concept are presented on Table 2,below. More <br /> detailed information is provided in Appendix C. <br /> Table 2—ESTIMATED PHASE I CONCEPT COSTS <br /> Project Construction Component Cost <br /> 1 CR E Medians(Connelly St&Pine Tree Dr) $49,900 <br /> 2 CR E Seal Coat and Striping $79,600 <br /> 3 CR E Corridor Decorative Lighting $370,900 <br /> 4 CR E Trees(40'Spacing) $44,400 <br /> 5 CR E Sidewalk $104,200 <br /> 6 Pine Tree Dr. Sidewalk $61,400 <br /> 7 Pine Tree Dr. Signal Revision $71,900 <br /> 8 Connelly Street Signal Revision $71,900 <br /> 9 Lexin ton Signal Revision And Widening $559,400 <br /> Property Access Modifications <br /> 10 Holiday Inn and Adjacent Properties $160,300 <br /> 11 TCF/North Park Access Connection $28,800 <br /> 12 Staples/Baskets B Design Connection $28,800 <br /> Anchor Bank/WJ Anderson Backage Road and <br /> 13 1 CR E Median Extension $95,900 <br /> 141 Connell Street/Bingo Hall Access $64,900 <br /> 15 1 TCF CR E Access And Parking Improvements $21,900 <br /> Total Cost $1,814 200 <br /> Note:All estimates indicated include total project costs(contingencies, engineering, <br /> construction administration, etc.). ROW acquisition costs are not included. <br /> 4.0 CONCLUSIONS <br /> Based on the technical analysis performed for this project as well as the discussions that have taken place <br /> with the Project Management Team,the Corridor Advisory Committee,individual business owners, and <br /> the City Council,Bolton&Menk recommends that Council consider the implementation of the Phase I <br /> Concept. This concept is generally consistent with the vision identified in the 2008 Guiding Plan,but <br /> reflects a pragmatic approach that is favored by local stakeholders. <br /> Prepared by:Bolton&Menk,Inc. <br /> Project No.T16.104355 County Rd E(B-2 District)Implementation Plan-Page 7 <br />