Laserfiche WebLink
Parks, Trails & Recreation Committee Meeting Minutes November 20, 2012 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br /> <br />making the rink a bit smaller. Mr. Maurer indicated the cost of the proposed <br />improvements would fall into the $65,000-$70,000 range and if the committee was in <br />favor of going forward, it could be included in the next CIP. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding the improvements and concerns about the soil north of the <br />rink and also concern about compromising the ice rink to increase the parking area. It <br />was the consensus of the committee to have the rink as large as possible. <br /> <br />Mr. Maurer indicated if a rain garden is added, they would replace some of the soil with <br />engineered soil and they could try to increase the parking without compromising the <br />pleasure rink. <br /> <br />Michelle noted two improvements that the committee had asked her to look into, but not <br />recommended by staff, was painting the outside of the hockey rink and the Plexiglas at <br />each end of the rink. <br /> <br />B. 2013 Goal Discussion <br />Parks and Recreation Manager Olson recapped that at the last meeting she had asked that <br />each committee member bring forward 2-4 goals for consideration at the November <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Committee Member Larson suggested continuing with the buckthorn work that was done <br />in October and possibly having an adopt a park since the buckthorn removal would <br />require continued maintenance. She suggested establishing Hazelnut Park as a <br />demonstration project for the removal and maintenance of buckthorn and also educating <br />the residents on buckthorn removal. <br /> <br />Committee Member Michaelson also suggested working on the buckthorn removal and <br />educating and informing the community on buckthorn. He indicated the committee could <br />establish a program on how to get rid of it and then establish a strategy. <br /> <br />Ms. Larson also suggested looking at ADA guidelines during the annual walkthrough of <br />the parks to find areas that do not meet the ADA guidelines. <br /> <br />Ms. O’Malley also agreed the committee should assess the accessibility in the parks and <br />that it would be nice to see people being able to use the parks. <br /> <br />Ms. Larson suggested eliminating the paper PTRC packets. She suggested having the <br />PDF e-mailed to the members instead and only having a couple paper copies at the <br />meetings. <br /> <br />Ms. Olson indicated that it is up to the committee if they would rather have the packet e- <br />mailed versus receiving a hard copy. <br /> <br />Committee Member Larson also indicated she would like to see nicer toilets installed in <br />the parks. She recommended the committee research more permanent bathrooms. <br /> <br />