My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1B, Multi-Family Dwelling Regulations Discussion
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
01-22-13-WS
>
1B, Multi-Family Dwelling Regulations Discussion
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/18/2013 11:21:23 AM
Creation date
1/18/2013 11:21:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS PLANNING COMMISSION WORK SESSION—JULY 11, 2012 2 <br /> of concern that should be focused on. The comments will be used by staff as draft <br /> regulations are created, which will be brought back for review by the Planning <br /> Commission in August. <br /> City Planner Beekman reviewed a list of possible areas to be considered when drafting <br /> design standards for multi-family housing. The items were not exhaustive, but staff <br /> would benefit greatly by the Commission providing comment <br /> Chair Larson opened the floor to Commission questions. <br /> Chair Larson was in favor of a market study being completed on the multi-family needs <br /> for Ramsey County. This would determine if there was a need for efficiency apartments. <br /> Commissioner Thompson indicated it would be interesting to learn more about <br /> surrounding communities' multi-family housing structures with regard to the size of the <br /> units and number of police calls taken at each site. <br /> Commissioner Holewa stated the police calls taken at the Holiday Inn site when leased <br /> by Northwestern were mostly to service vehicles and had nothing to do with the size of <br /> the rental units. <br /> Commissioner Stodola commented multi-family housing deals with more than just <br /> apartment complexes. She encouraged the Commission to consider this when proposing <br /> standards for City Code. <br /> City Planner Beekman stated multi-family units had to include three or more attached <br /> units. She noted senior living has its own classification within City Code. <br /> The Commission further discussed the differences between multi-family dwellings versus <br /> townhome units and single-family homes. <br /> City Planner Beekman reported that based on preliminary review of other communities in <br /> the metropolitan area, cities that have minimum unit size requirements have regulations <br /> that range from 450 to 650 square feet. <br /> Commissioner Hames did not feel it was necessary to regulate the square footage of units <br /> as neighboring communities do not set standards and do not have problems with their <br /> rental housing. She indicated the market would determine if there was a need for the <br /> efficiency apartments. <br /> Commissioner Stodola stated it would be valuable to have a market study on the number <br /> of units available in the area based on square footage. <br /> Chair Larson explained the Met Council would be in favor of three and four bedroom <br /> apartments. <br /> Commissioner Thompson was in favor of setting a size minimum as this was not New <br /> York City or Japan. The City should match the size and style of those available in <br /> neighboring communities with a minimum amount of amenities as well. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.