My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Draft Minutes November 19, 2012, Work Session
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
City Council
>
City Council Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2013
>
01-28-13-R
>
Draft Minutes November 19, 2012, Work Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/24/2013 12:13:07 PM
Creation date
1/24/2013 12:13:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION—NOVEMBER 19, 2012 8 <br /> Community Development Director Hutmacher stated this would be part of the Master Planning <br /> process. <br /> Councilmember Holden inquired if the County would be able to place special assessments on <br /> properties within TCAAP. <br /> Mr. Norton did not believe this would be possible. <br /> Councilmember Holden questioned who would be responsible for the developer RFP process. <br /> Mr. Norton commented that the JDA would be responsible for the developer RFP process. <br /> Councilmember Holden suggested the Master Plan be allowed to be amended on an annual <br /> basis. She also wanted to be assured that Comprehensive Plan Amendments were made in a cost <br /> efficient manner. <br /> Director of Finance and Administrative Services Iverson explained that Comprehensive Plan <br /> Amendments could be billed back to future developers to cover Staff's expense. She noted this <br /> could be written into the fee schedule. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked if the JDA could apply for grants. <br /> Community Development Director Hutmacher stated this would typically be done by the City, <br /> the EDA, or the County. <br /> Councilmember Holden inquired why the City would be overseeing the final remediation of <br /> properties and suggested this remain with the County. <br /> Mr. Norton recommended this remain as written as it would assure that developers have properly <br /> met all MPCA requirements prior to any development taking place. <br /> Community Development Director Hutmacher explained this would not differ from the current <br /> process used by the City. <br /> Councilmember Holden asked why the City would be responsible for jointly requesting <br /> legislative bonding with the County. <br /> Councilmember Holmes was troubled by this language. <br /> Mr. Norton stated the County and the City were partners and the County wanted to be assured <br /> that the City was backing their requests. He indicated the largest expenses for this development <br /> would be the off-site transportation. <br /> Councilmember Holden suggested the "will"be changed to "may". <br /> Mr. Norton commented the intent would be to have the City lobby on behalf of the County to <br /> receive State or Federal bonding. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.