Laserfiche WebLink
r4+16t-t G VI <br /> 1.1 <br /> x 2.2 3.7 <br /> T 3.1 ® • <br /> 5.1 1.0 <br /> 12.1 4 <br /> 1.6 1.1 <br /> 3.2 1.5 3.2 3.1 <br /> 16.6 <br /> 2.7 <br /> 10.1 <br /> �g, �° 3.1 3.2 <br /> 5.9 <br /> 2.4 3.9 <br /> 2.3 4.6 <br /> 10.6 3.5 3.7 7e:; <br /> �a <br /> 1.5 5.8 <br /> WA <br /> i <br /> i <br /> Hal Hovey :s- ,State ,Scoreboar <br /> T , AL way to r<uilc state tax burdens is to com- <br /> p�re# tes'ar►d personal income. An alternative is to <br /> measure state and local taxes and fees per worker.It is <br /> a method that is preferred by taxpayer groups in <br /> California because it captures fees that local govern- <br /> tnents use to avoid voter-imposed tax limits•The per- <br /> r er method may,however,distort burdens in stittes <br /> lorida with large numbe rs of retirees, or in <br /> F where 1 lot of people work m other states. <br /> ` .s c,V <br /> .' 1 dy <br /> 8 17 6 <br /> *e <br /> 13 10 <br /> 12 <br /> 4 A� <br /> 15 <br /> 16 <br /> f � m <br /> j State and local taxes and <br /> z ' fees per worker,FY 1993 18 <br /> ' 0 3 M,,$7.000 or more <br /> u1$6.000 to$6.999 <br /> $5.500 to$5,999 <br /> d i$5,000 to$5,499 <br /> M, <br /> Less than$5,000 <br /> Source:California Taxpayers Association <br /> 4 <br />