Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />6.The existing garage does not meet the ceiling height requirements of the Building Code, <br />thus the proposed garage would bring the property into greater conformance with modern <br />building code requirements. <br /> <br />7.The dwelling with the proposed addition would not exceed the 35 foot height limit. <br /> <br />8.Dwellings and garages are permitted structures within the R-1 Zone. <br /> <br />9.The existing dwelling and the proposed garage are outside of the 100-year flood plain, <br />wetlands, and easements. <br /> <br />Variance Findings: <br /> <br />10.The proposal is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the ordinance because it <br />utilizes the topography of the parcel to minimize visual impact from the addition. <br /> <br />11.The proposal is consistent with the comprehensive plan because it allows the reasonable <br />use of residential property. <br /> <br />12.A garage and addition are permitted and reasonable uses within the R-1 Zone. <br /> <br />13.The lot is comparably unique in the City. The property is situated on the curve of Skiles <br />Lane as it intersects with Snelling Avenue, thus creating three front yard setback <br />requirements to the south, east, and west sides of the lot. <br /> <br />14.The topographic conditions are unique in that there is a significant slope downward from <br />the west to the east which allows the majority of the addition to be built below grade. <br /> <br />15.Since the proposed above grade addition would not encroach any farther into the front <br />yard setback than the existing structure, the addition is unlikely to have a negative impact <br />on the property or the neighborhood. The continued encroachment would have a minimal <br />visual impact from Skiles Lane. <br /> <br />16.The addition would be visible from the rear of the property, which abuts Snelling <br />Avenue; however, the area is heavily wooded and the closest neighbor on this side is over <br />300 feet away. <br /> <br />17.The proposed plans and setback variance for the dwelling do not appear to be based on <br />economic considerations alone. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br /> <br />The Planning Commission reviewed this application at the March 6, 2013, meeting (Attachment <br />A), and unanimously recommends approval of Planning Case 13-001 for a variance at 1455 <br />Skiles Lane, based on the findings of fact, submitted plans, as amended by the following <br />conditions: <br /> <br />1.The project shall be completed in accordance with the plans submitted as amended by <br />the conditions of approval. Any significant changes to these plans, as determined by <br />the City Planner, shall require review and approval by the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />2.The applicant shall obtain approval from the Rice Creek Watershed District, and a <br />copy of the RCWD permit or a waiver shall be submitted to the City prior to the <br />issuance of any building permits. <br /> <br />3.The structure shall conform to all other regulations in the City Code. <br /> <br />4.The addition shall be the same color and use the same construction materials as the <br />existing structure. <br />City of Arden Hills <br /> <br />City Council Meeting for March 25, 2013 <br /> <br />34 <br />Page of <br /> <br />