Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF ARDEN HILLS <br />PARKS, TRAILS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE MEETING <br />TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2013 <br />ARDEN HILLS CITY HALL <br />CALL MEETING TO ORDER <br />Chair O’Malley called the February 26,2013, meeting of the Parks, Trails,and Recreation <br />Committee to order at 6:30p.m. <br />MEMBERS PRESENT: <br />Committee Chair Nancy O’Malley, Committee Members Phil <br />Kramlinger, Jane Larson(arrived at 6:35 p.m.),Don Messerly, Chuck Michaelson, Harold Petersen, <br />Steve Scott, Rich Straumann, Matt Trites (arrived at 7:00 p.m.),and John Van Valkenburg. <br />OTHERS PRESENT: <br />Parksand Recreation Manager Michelle Olson,Council Liaison Fran <br />Holmes and Guest Charles Kachel. <br />ABSENT: <br />Committee Member Cindy Garretson (excused)and Committee Member John Peck <br />(excused). <br />1.APPROVAL OF AGENDA <br />MOTION: <br />Committee MemberMesserlymotioned to approve the agendaseconded by <br />Committee MemberMichaelson. The motion carried unanimously(8-0). <br />2.APPROVAL OF MINUTES –January8, 2013 <br />MOTION: <br />Committee MemberMesserlymotioned to approve theJanuary 8,2013,minutesas <br />presented,secondedby Committee MemberPeterson.The motion carried <br />unanimously(8-0). <br />3.UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br />A.Trail Priority Discussion <br />Ms. Olson indicated that she has included a future trail listing mapand has revised the <br />map and listing with the changes that were discussed at the January meeting. She <br />indicated she did check with Public Works Director Maurer about restriping north <br />Snelling Avenue (96 to Briarknoll) instead of having a trail. Mr. Maurer indicated it is <br />not recommendedsince the segment is not wide enough. Discussion ensued and it was <br />the consensus of the committee to take off “restriping” and to move this segment to low <br />priorityand also to move segments N, C, and C1 to high priority.Committee Member <br />Kramlinger indicated thesegments with safety concerns are the ones that should be high <br />priority and felt those should alsobe ranked in order (i.e., I as #1andthen Eas #2, etc.). <br />After further discussion the committee decided to only rank the two highest priorities. <br />