My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-29-13-EDA
ArdenHills
>
Administration
>
Commissions, Committees, and Boards
>
Economic Development Authority (EDA)
>
EDA Packets
>
2011-2020
>
2013
>
04-29-13
>
04-29-13-EDA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2013 2:48:49 PM
Creation date
4/29/2013 2:48:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ARDEN HILLS EDA MEETING FEBRUARY 25, 2013 2 <br />3. CONSENT CALENDAR <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />4. NEW BUSINESS <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />5. UNFINISHED BUSINESS <br /> <br /> <br />A.Tax Increment Financing and Business Subsidy Policy <br /> <br />Community Development Director Hutmacher <br />stated that Stacie Kvilvang from Ehlers & <br />Associates attended the City Council work session on August 20, 2012, and discussed priorities <br />for public financing assistance. She noted that Council discussion at that meeting helped develop <br />the Public Financing Priority Framework as well as the Business Subsidy Policy; both of which <br />were included in the agenda packet . <br /> <br />Stacie Kvilvang, Ehlers & Associates, <br />presented information on the Public Financing Priority <br />Framework. She reviewed the ranking criteria that she compiled based upon Council discussion <br />at the August 20, 2012, work session. She noted that the predetermined ranking criteria will <br />assist the City in determining how to award business subsidies. <br /> <br />Ms. Kvilvang <br />handed out and reviewed several examples of the grading and report cards for <br />potential redevelopment projects. The examples illustrated how each project would rank based <br />on the point values which are determined by the ranking criteria. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued regarding the various report card scoring factors. <br /> <br />Ms. Kvilvang <br />discussed the draft copy of the Business Subsidy Criteria and City Public <br />Financing Guidelines. <br /> <br />Discussion took place regarding the analysis of TIF and Total Tax Capacity. <br /> <br />Council consensus was to remove the City of Mounds View from the chart comparing the five- <br />county area urban cities with populations between 8,000 and 50,000 and to have staff recalculate <br />the numbers. <br /> <br />City Administrator Klaers <br />stated that staff will re-do the numbers and will bring it back to the <br />April 29, 2013, EDA meeting for further discussion. <br /> <br />6. EDA COMMISSIONER COMMENTS <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.